Talk:Sears, Roebuck and Company Complex

	Chicago portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chicago, which aims to improve all articles or pages related to Chicago or the Chicago metropolitan area.ChicagoWikipedia:WikiProject ChicagoTemplate:WikiProject ChicagoChicago articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

National Register of Historic Places High‑importance

	National Register of Historic Places portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject National Register of Historic Places, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of U.S. historic sites listed on the National Register of Historic Places on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.National Register of Historic PlacesWikipedia:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesTemplate:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesNational Register of Historic Places articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Illinois Mid‑importance

	Illinois portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Illinois, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Illinois on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IllinoisWikipedia:WikiProject IllinoisTemplate:WikiProject IllinoisWikiProject Illinois articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Merger proposal

Latest comment: 13 years ago5 comments5 people in discussion

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.

I proposed merging the 2 separate articles on the tower and the administration building into this article about the complex, because i believe all the info can be handled in one article about the complex. It is not possible to get rid of the article about the complex, however, because the complex as a whole is designated a NRHP and NHL. So i want to discuss the tower and the admin building in the complex article. It may be the case that the two are separately listed Chicago Landmarks. If so, each can have a separate section. Comments? doncram (talk) 18:09, 10 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

Support merging Admin building here. Is there a chance that if the NHL is removed from the complex the tower will retain the designation? I guess since we should not WP:CRYSTALball, I support moving that too.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 16:58, 12 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

Support. Three separate articles are not necessary in this instance. BTW, the Admin Bldg article is written as if the structure, protected by historic landmark status, is no longer extant. True? Wikiuser100 (talk) 19:25, 12 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

Support and agree that the tower and admin building should have their own sections, but within a unified article. Kevin Forsyth (talk) 15:12, 24 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

Merge done. -- P 1 9 9 • TALK 16:52, 1 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Request move

Latest comment: 10 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: article moved per WP:SILENCE. Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 10:55, 9 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

Sears, Roebuck, and Company Complex → Sears, Roebuck and Company Complex – Revert the insertion of the Oxford comma, which, in the six years since it was moved the other way, has not been inserted in references in the article, except for an external link where the destination no longer refers to this name at all. Also it corresponds to Sears, Roebuck and Company which redirects to Sears (and Sears, Roebuck, and Company has no links). (The without-comma redirect almost has more pages linking to it than directly already, but I've just moved one that way because I changed a red link and let the search and replace change another link too.) --Relisted. Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 07:12, 2 July 2014 (UTC) Mark Hurd (talk) 12:24, 25 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

Note: The user who originally moved to the comma version, User:Doncram, doesn't mind it being undone. Mark Hurd (talk) 01:06, 3 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Add topic