This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Korea, a collaborative effort to build and improve articles related to Korea. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how use this banner, please refer to the documentation.KoreaWikipedia:WikiProject KoreaTemplate:WikiProject KoreaKorea-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cold War, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Cold War on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Cold WarWikipedia:WikiProject Cold WarTemplate:WikiProject Cold WarCold War articles
There isn't a map that covers this battle in any detail. The only map there is used in all the Pusan Perimeter articles, and it covers far too large an area to be useful. —Ed!(talk)14:34, 10 March 2011 (UTC)Reply
There were occasional attacks 9th Infantry forward positions, but to the men in the front line this appeared to be only normal patrol action. → There were occasional attacks on the 9th Infantry's forward positions, but to the men in the front lines this appeared to be only normal patrol action.
Not practically. The article covers several small battles happening simultaneously across the river front, so most of them have the same dates. Info is broken up by location, not time. —Ed!(talk)19:22, 24 March 2011 (UTC)Reply