This article is within the scope of WikiProject Africa, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Africa on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AfricaWikipedia:WikiProject AfricaTemplate:WikiProject AfricaAfrica articles
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject France, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of France on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FranceWikipedia:WikiProject FranceTemplate:WikiProject FranceFrance articles
Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
I understand that France was a global empire at this point and was much more technologically advanced than the small kingdom, but Dahomey was armed with (at the time) modern weapons and had a vast numerical advantage. Was Béhanzin just a bad commander? Was it France's Napoleonic battlefield strategies that gave them a decisive victory? Is there anywhere I can read up on this? Other African states such as the Waddai, Serer, and Wassoulou gave the French a much harder time before being conquered. 2601:18F:600:D40:E0CD:65B:AAAE:F88C (talk) 17:54, 12 October 2022 (UTC)Reply