Talk:Second U.S. presidential debate of 2012
Latest comment: 11 years ago by 2001:db8 in topic Really?
This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Article class
editTechnically, this is a stub, but it will likely become a "start" shortly.Mercurywoodrose (talk) 02:54, 17 October 2012 (UTC)
Candidate prep
editIf it's useful, Newsday (LI newspaper) has an article on where and how the candidates prepped: [1] czar · · 21:29, 17 October 2012 (UTC)
Really?
editWe have articles on individual debates now? – Muboshgu (talk) 15:03, 19 October 2012 (UTC)
- I think it's a bit ridiculous too. It just makes it harder to actually add information, since it has to be added to both articles or summarized for the other in many cases. Or they just get out of sync (as has inevitably happened already; e.g., the main page having more detail on poll numbers this one, and similar other issues spanning all the debates.) WP:REDUNDANTFORK – 2001:db8:: (rfc | diff) 19:11, 20 October 2012 (UTC)