This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion.
To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
A response section needs to be added to this article, or the current one needs to be expanded. This section should be well cited using neutral and reliable sources that discuss the reaction of both critics and the viewing audience to the show. Additionally, document any impact the show has had on society, and merchandise that may have resulted from the show, such as toys, games, etc.
An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Disney, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of The Walt Disney Company and its affiliated companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DisneyWikipedia:WikiProject DisneyTemplate:WikiProject DisneyDisney articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Toys, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of toys on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ToysWikipedia:WikiProject ToysTemplate:WikiProject ToysToys articles
Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
The last sentence of the read states that none of the characters were played by Jim Henson. But so what? Before that, there's no mention of Jim Henson at all, neither in the lead nor the infobox, nor any company with which he was associated.
While the sentence could stand, I think therefore it needs qualification here to suggest why it might have been. i.e. the fact that it wasn't (cos he was dead) is only relevant because he might otherwise have been. I don't think, as it's written, it stands on its own feet as an exception that proves the rule.
.svg){kind=small}
