Talk:Section 301 of the Trade Act of 1974
Latest comment: 2 years ago by PrimeBOT in topic Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
editThis article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 21 August 2019 and 27 November 2019. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Lancecbrown1.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 08:52, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
Merger proposal
editSection 301 and Super 301 both refer to the same provision. Some thoughts:
- I think the name "Section 301" is too vague. Perhaps a better name for the merged article would be "Section 301 of the Trade Act of 1974"
- Is there enough info to keep this page separate from Trade Act of 1974?
- Should probably integrate information from/with Office of the United States Trade Representative#The_Special_301_Report
Thanks. Stephen (talk) 18:40, 18 March 2010 (UTC)
- Responses:
- I strongly agree that these articles should be merged. When I created the Section 301 article, I was just copy-pasting entries out of the Department of Agriculture's free glossary. The mistake was theirs: The original Section 301 article made no reference to Super 301, even though it had a separate entry on super 301.
- Section 301 of the Trade Act of 1974 is, indeed, a better name. But Section 301 and Super 301 should remain as redirects, at least until somebody decides to turn those into disambiguation pages.
- I do believe that there is enough info for this to be a separate article from Trade Act of 1974.
- Andrew Gradman talk/WP:Hornbook 21:21, 18 March 2010 (UTC)
- Responses: