Talk:Securities Exchange Act of 1934

Registration of all broker dealers

2/25/06: On the section dealing with NASD and NASDAQ, the reference goes: "the 34 Act requires the registration of 'virtually all' broker dealers, placing them under the direct oversight of the SEC and the oversight of the NASD." I thought, tho, that the 34 Act required the registration of 'all broker dealers,' or all people who in the language of the exchange act 'effect securities.' So while there is a narrow exception for a finder, they wouldn't, as a definitional matter, be a broker. So it's more appropriate to say that the 34 act requires the registration of all broker dealers, rather than 'virtually all.' Jahenderson 06:52, 9 March 2006 (UTC)

Also, NASD (I believe) has direct oversight of B/Ds. So that sentence should read: "NASD has direct oversight of B/Ds, with the SEC retaining appellate jurisdiction" or some language like that. Comments?Jahenderson 06:52, 9 March 2006 (UTC)

SHO Form

I heard mention of a Regulation SHO form (apprx. 2 pages) some type of options forms which entitle those who have signed it to monies quarterly. I don't know anything more about it, but wondered if anyone could enlighten me on this. I believe it was part of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934. Thanks.

Kathy Kirlin
kskmv3@yahoo.com —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.96.69.201 (talk) 19:43, 7 November 2008 (UTC)

List of SROs

FINRA is not the only SRO in operation. While it regulates 80% of aggregate trading, it is not the only SRO in the United States. The following is a list of SROs that operate/ have operated in the US. Note that of course NASD and the NYSE regulation arm are now defunct, but there are exchanges which dont fall under Finra
http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml —Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.211.40.22 (talk) 16:06, 6 September 2010 (UTC)

History missing

Can we have someone add some history to the creation of the act. Who created it? FDR? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.228.15.21 (talk) 22:52, 11 November 2011 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.businessweek.com/bwdaily/dnflash/may2006/nf20060523_2210.htm
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060205020232/http://www.law.uc.edu/CCL/33Act/sec17.html to http://www.law.uc.edu/CCL/33Act/sec17.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20040610171913/http://www.law.uc.edu/CCL/34Act/ to http://www.law.uc.edu/CCL/34Act/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:26, 5 September 2017 (UTC)