Talk:Sedgehill School

Latest comment: 5 years ago by ClemRutter in topic Note to interested editors
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Sedgehill School. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 08:45, 17 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

Note to interested editors

edit

Sedgehill does have an interesting history as a large purpose build comprehensive. then as a millenium rebuild maintaining a roll of over 1000. It has a unusual partnership maintained school- academy chain- wheareas maintained school- academy would not be allowed. As such, the roll of Lewisham in making this happen is apposite and an investigation of HR and Curriculum can go into further depth than normal. ClemRutter (talk) 20:51, 28 August 2019 (UTC)Reply