Talk:Segunda Federación

Payroll

• Does anyone know the breakdown of professional, semi-professional, & amateur teams at this level? Kenallen (talk) 00:12, 17 February 2009 (UTC)

• The teams that were demoted from the Segunda A within the past four or five years are more or less professional clubs. Teams promoted from the Tercera within the same time frame are basicly amateur. Just about all reserve teams could be considered amateur except for the few clubs that have two reserve teams: Castlla, Atletico B, & Bilbao Athletic could be called semi-professional as well as Barcelona Atletic. For the clubs from Madrid, you can go to the Madrid FA website and it will give the player status breakdown. Raul17 (talk) 21:22, 17 February 2009 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Rfef.jpg

Image:Rfef.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:23, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Rfef.jpg

Image:Rfef.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 04:35, 24 January 2008 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Rfef.jpg

Image:Rfef.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 04:35, 18 February 2008 (UTC)

Mallorca B team

RCD Mallorca B says they compete in this level for the fourth year in row, yet they are missing from the table. At least the article says they've been 15 seasons on this level, and 15 is the cutoff for this table. 85.217.21.135 (talk) 01:48, 11 January 2013 (UTC)

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion:

• 2ª B Logo.png

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 14:21, 31 July 2018 (UTC)

Requested move 8 July 2021

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) Lennart97 (talk) 11:29, 15 July 2021 (UTC)

---

Segunda División B → Segunda División RFEF – New division name, per Marca, RFEF, Diario AS and so on. Also known as Segunda RFEF. BRDude⁷⁰ (talk) 05:02, 8 July 2021 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related page moves. GiantSnowman 17:45, 8 July 2021 (UTC)

• Support per nom, on basis that this is just a simple renaming and not any kind of league re-organisation. GiantSnowman 17:54, 8 July 2021 (UTC)
• Support per GiantSnowman and per nom. Paul Vaurie (talk) 20:02, 12 July 2021 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.