Talk:Self-linking number
Latest comment: 4 years ago by 50.205.142.35 in topic The article seems to omit some important things
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
This material was in the linking number article, but it seems both tangential and a little too technical to be included there. Jim 02:36, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
The article seems to omit some important things
editDoesn't a knot need to be oriented for its self-linking number to be defined?
And shouldn't the article include a few concrete examples of self-linking number?50.205.142.35 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 10:51, 12 December 2019 (UTC)