This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women scientists, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women in science on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women scientistsWikipedia:WikiProject Women scientistsTemplate:WikiProject Women scientistsWomen scientists articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity articles
Don't start with "widely but incorrectly considered", let the first sentence say who she was (Austrian, or Israeli physicist). Also leave Olga Steindler out of the lead - you already established that Freud wasn't first, if someone wants to know who was first, I think that's best left for the body of the article.
I don't love Baptized a Protestant, Selma Freud was... - it feels very German to me, I can hear the accent when I read it. I think it's better to start with Selma Freud was the daughter of... and mention her religion later. Is there some specific significance here? I could see that with the connection to the Salvation Army, but it feels a little disconnected.
Reading more, the construct of the translation is still very German. A lot of it needs to be re-written. It might be a bit early for feedback yet. Ian (Wiki Ed) (talk) 14:11, 14 May 2019 (UTC)Reply
