This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computer science, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Computer science related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Computer scienceWikipedia:WikiProject Computer scienceTemplate:WikiProject Computer scienceComputer science articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Linguistics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of linguistics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LinguisticsWikipedia:WikiProject LinguisticsTemplate:WikiProject LinguisticsLinguistics articles
This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Thsi came through AfC. It appears well referenced and detailed but could use a good review by someone that is an expert in this area. A previous creation by tue same writer was deleted Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Self-explaining but the type of page is very different. This one is much longer and heavily sourced than the deleted one. This is not a copyvio. Legacypac (talk) 02:51, 17 October 2018 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 6 years ago4 comments2 people in discussion
@Uanfala: while the article needs a fair amount of work (regardless of what title it is eventually kept under), I'd argue that this article already includes content about semantic decomposition for contexts other than AI. Most of the content in the article is relevant to semantic decomposition as an algorithmic technique regardless of the intended application of the results, and is thus relevant to fields outside of AI. Several of the cited articles are not primarily about semantic decomposition's AI applications. Moreover, based on my familiarity with the subject in a professional capacity, I don't really see any need for differentiating between semantic decomposition in AI contexts and in more general contexts, as the strategy is ultimately the same (the only difference is what you do with the output). In a similar vein, we don't have separate articles for Part-of-speech tagging in AI, computational linguistic research, etc., we just have one article for the technique that covers all contexts. signed, Rosguilltalk22:33, 18 October 2018 (UTC)Reply
That's a good point. I think Semantic decomposition (natural language processing) is a good fit. Looking through Google Scholar results for "semantic decomposition", it appears that this phrase is used to refer to (what appear to be) separate concepts in NLP, logic ([1]), and pure linguistics ([2]), although NLP-related papers appear to be by far the most common usage of the term. In light of this, should we set up a DAB page? signed, Rosguilltalk23:24, 18 October 2018 (UTC)Reply
Yep, this titlel sounds good, and I think we can safely rename the article. As for the dab page, at the moment, I don't have the time to have a rigorous look at the litetarure to figure out precisely what is meant by the term, but if you have any solid definitions, feel free to start one. – Uanfala (talk)08:41, 22 October 2018 (UTC)Reply