 | This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
The section on the type of molecules and the list don't really add much, and provide a rather old-fashioned view of phylogenetic data and methods. I think that the article would be better ending after the first paragraph, and linking to other sources about phylogenetically informative genes instead. Any other views? XCalPab (talk) 19:33, 28 November 2015 (UTC)