Talk:Sembawang MRT station/GA1
Latest comment: 3 years ago by ArnabSaha in topic GA Review
GA Review
edit| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: ArnabSaha (talk · contribs) 12:56, 26 April 2021 (UTC)
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
- Is it well written?
- A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:
- B. It complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation:
- A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:
- Is it verifiable with no original research?
- A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:
- B. All in-line citations are from reliable sources, including those for direct quotations, statistics, published opinion, counter-intuitive or controversial statements that are challenged or likely to be challenged, and contentious material relating to living persons—science-based articles should follow the scientific citation guidelines:
- C. It contains no original research:
- D. It contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism:
- A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:
- B. It stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style):
- A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:
- Is it neutral?
- It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
- It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
- Is it stable?
- It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:
- It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:
- Is it illustrated, if possible, by images?
- A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
- B. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
- A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
- Overall:
- Pass or Fail:
- Pass or Fail:
Comments
edit- Solved a minor spelling mistake
- Any artwork details?
- Station operator not mentioned in body.
- Need citation for disabled access, parking access etc.
- "www.lta.gov.sg" omit www
- Several citations don't have any link. As much as I know Straits Times articles are archived.
- Need citation for the note.
- Wikilink Woodlands. If possible add more wikilinks.
- Add "NS11" as station code in infobox.
- "line | Infopedia" remove infopedia.
- What is kampung?
- Expand lead a little bit if possible.
Saha ❯❯❯ Stay safe 13:37, 26 April 2021 (UTC)
Addressed all issues. Well, there was consensus to remove the NS11 as station code in the infobox, since it is already at the top, and it is unnecessarily repetitive. The news articles after 1990 don't have online archives accessible to the public, hence they don't have a web link. The artworks only apply mainly to the newer lines such as the NEL, CCL, DTL and TEL. This station was built prior to the introduction of the Art in Transit programme in 1997.--ZKang123 (talk) 10:30, 27 April 2021 (UTC)
- Good to go Saha ❯❯❯ Stay safe 11:08, 27 April 2021 (UTC)