Talk:Senegal at the 1984 Winter Olympics
Latest comment: 8 years ago by Miyagawa in topic GA Review
Senegal at the 1984 Winter Olympics has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: October 18, 2016. (Reviewed version). |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
GA Review
editGA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Senegal at the 1984 Winter Olympics/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Jaguar (talk · contribs) 21:05, 17 October 2016 (UTC)
I should have this by the morning JAGUAR 21:05, 17 October 2016 (UTC)
- Minor, but I noticed that "Senegal" and "1984 Winter Olympics" are not emboldened. However in some articles they aren't!
- "This was the first time a Black African competed at the Winter Olympics" - should 'black' be capitalised in this case?
- "as he was recovering from injury" - an injury or injuries
- "Guèye was the first Black African to compete at the Winter Games" - again, de-capitalise it if you decide to!
- No dead links
- No dab links
Minor stuff, but I spotchecked all of the sources and they check out fine. Will promote once all are clarified! JAGUAR 21:46, 17 October 2016 (UTC)
- @Jaguar: Thanks for reviewing. I hadn't realised until Yellow Dingo reviewed an article, but as it turns out the Senegal and 1984 Winter Olympics shouldn't be bolded per MOS:TITLEABSENTBOLD. I wasn't sure about the Black African part, and while Google seems to think that it should, the Black people article doesn't use the capitalisation. So I've changed it to lowercase. Also fixed the injury bit too. Miyagawa (talk) 17:08, 18 October 2016 (UTC)
- I didn't know that it shouldn't be emboldened, so I'll keep that in mind for future reviews. And I was probably wrong about the black capitalisation too. Anyway, with all of them out of the way this should be good to go now! JAGUAR 17:31, 18 October 2016 (UTC)
- I'm sure if the capitalisation was wrong, it'd be the sort of thing fixed by a bot. Miyagawa (talk) 17:54, 18 October 2016 (UTC)
- I didn't know that it shouldn't be emboldened, so I'll keep that in mind for future reviews. And I was probably wrong about the black capitalisation too. Anyway, with all of them out of the way this should be good to go now! JAGUAR 17:31, 18 October 2016 (UTC)