Talk:Seo Taiji and Boys
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This  level-5 vital article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
edit
This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Modaesu. Peer reviewers: Scmoore11.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 08:58, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
Cleaning up.
editHis article needs some cleaning up. Anyone care to help me? I'm going to remove statements like -He will never again say that he will retire from music; it will just be a long hiatus if needed, but never a retirement. I'm sorry but that statement is laughable. You can tell it was written by a Fan Boy. I'm going to remove the unsourced fluff from this article.--BeckiGreen (talk) 18:41, 16 November 2012 (UTC)
yes great idea — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.18.105.125 (talk) 23:34, 21 January 2020 (UTC)
Forgot to add that I am going to remove the following as well -Taiji's life after retirement in the United States is unknown to the public due to his high profile status. Does that statement make sense to anyone? Maybe I am not understanding it correctly. The way I read it is he is unknown to the public because he has a high profile status. But wouldn't he be WELL known if he had a high profile status? Shouldn't it be LOW profile status? I'm going to remove it because it reads like someone's opinion.--BeckiGreen (talk) 18:51, 16 November 2012 (UTC)