There seem to be issues with the summary and the History section of this document.

edit

It appears that the summary of this article has issues, as it links the same reference in three consecutive sentences. Since those sentences are already sequential, I suggest removing two of the duplicated references. Additionally, there seem to be issues with the "History" section of this article, as it appears to be overly promotional. While I understand the desire to showcase the school's prestige, the "History" section should focus on the school's legal recognition as an educational institution since its establishment or how the school has expanded its undergraduate program over time. This is commonly referred to as the "evolution" of the school. I would like to move the content in the current "History" section to a new section and fill the "History" section with relevant content. If anyone disagrees with this opinion, I would like to hear their thoughts. Meloncookie (talk) 07:56, 17 April 2023 (UTC)Reply