Talk:Sequential coupling
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
Bad example of car
editWhen you step on the gas in a car before you turn the key, you can flood the engine which is also not good. In fact, I can't see where there would be a software class that if you call the "wrong" method, it doesn't fail. It should fail gracefully, but it should definitely not do nothing at all.Fine Arts 18:09, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
I agree. You should certainly alert the programmer.
Better example?
editA possible better example is a utility library that requires that one call some sequence of "init" functions in order to initialize it and create a useful working environment, rather than encapsulating this behavior in the creation of an object. The curses (programming library) library, for instance. One useful thing to do is to encapsulate the use of that library into a class. --FOo (talk) 11:40, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
Temporal coupling
editI faced only Temporal coupling term in such meaning. Sequential coupling looks less familiar. 91.103.66.203 (talk) 15:35, 12 January 2018 (UTC)