Talk:Serious Request
This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Most requested song
editIt's even more important than the yearly anthem, because it's also the song that made the most money, —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.101.72.96 (talk) 22:57, 24 December 2010 (UTC)
Split
editCurrently the article seems to cover all versions of the event. The main focus has been on the original 3FM version in The Netherlands, but there is a chart for all the international versions, so I am requesting the article be split into:
Its franchise and specific flows when independently notable as with Got Talent. 3FM of course gets its own.
If the other organizations are not related at all and are just copying the idea they can get their own article if notable by itself.
Another option (and perhaps a lot simpler) is to rename the article to Serious Request to cover all versions. I was hesitant on putting that up as it was renamed from that before. -AngusWOOF (talk) 16:35, 24 May 2013 (UTC)
- This article seems to be a coherent article and I can see no reason to start splitting it up. I agree that it would probably be better being called Serious Request. The rename was as a result of a discussion on the Netherland Wikipedia. Personally, I don't know enough Dutch to be able to identify the section where the discussion took place, let alone be able to understand the discussion. TBH the 3FM bit at the beginning seems like marketing (a bit like when a sports event suddenly becomes the Acme sports event). I would be more than happy for you to rename the article. Op47 (talk) 11:35, 4 August 2013 (UTC)
- Yeah, it was given a copyedit so it is most suited for a rename now. -AngusWOOF (talk) 15:29, 4 August 2013 (UTC)
Requested move
edit- The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the proposal was moved. --BDD (talk) 19:59, 13 August 2013 (UTC)
3FM Serious Request → Serious Request – article covers all incarnations of the event that it is no longer specific to 3FM AngusWOOF (talk) 15:29, 4 August 2013 (UTC) As noted above, I am in favour. Op47 (talk) 21:10, 9 August 2013 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Serious Request. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20141222172131/http://media.rtp.pt/tocaatodos/ to http://media.rtp.pt/tocaatodos/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:13, 2 June 2017 (UTC)