Talk:Serious Sam: The Second Encounter/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: XTheBedrockX (talk · contribs) 19:03, 11 November 2023 (UTC)

This article looks promising. Planning to give this a review.

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (reference section): b (inline citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

Conclusion

After a review of this article, I believe it meets all the criteria required for a GA-level article. Congratulations on making a quality page! — Preceding unsigned comment added by XTheBedrockX (talk • contribs) 08:56, 12 November 2023 (UTC)

Thank you for the review, @XTheBedrockX! I see you made a few edits to the article. They were largely pretty solid, though a few mistakes also seem to have slipped in (particularly regarding apostrophes). I fixed these just now and am happy that we brought the article into a decent state. Kind regards, IceWelder [✉] 11:56, 12 November 2023 (UTC)

You’re very welcome! XTheBedrockX (talk) 12:22, 12 November 2023 (UTC)