Talk:Seriously, Dude, I'm Gay
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Seriously, Dude, I'm Gay article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | Seriously, Dude, I'm Gay has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: August 17, 2022. (Reviewed version). |
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at pageviews.wmcloud.org |
GA Review
editThe following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Seriously, Dude, I'm Gay/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Sammi Brie (talk · contribs) 02:12, 17 August 2022 (UTC)
GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not) |
---|
|
Overall: |
· · · |
This is something very, very rare: an article ready out of the gate for GA! You should be very happy with the way this one turned out. I don't have to hold it—it's a straight (no pun intended) pass. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 02:28, 17 August 2022 (UTC)
Copy changes
edit- These were so minor I went ahead and made them. I'd like to draw the attention of Underclass King to MOS:INOROUT, which accounted for most of the tweaks. I also made it clearer in the lead that the reason for the WGA suit had nothing to do with LGBT representation, which might otherwise be inferred. You might also appreciate my essay User:Sammi Brie/Commas in sentences.
My only other suggestion is that Byram's "TV and the FCC [are] very sensitive right now" comment also has a lot to do with the aftermath of the Super Bowl XXXVIII halftime show controversy, which presumably would have been self-evident to a reader in 2004. But that's not something to hold up GA.
Other
edit- References are archived.
- One fair-use publicity image (which is understandable for an unaired TV show!) with alt text.
- Earwig turns up mostly quotes; no serious issues.