This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Technology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TechnologyWikipedia:WikiProject TechnologyTemplate:WikiProject TechnologyTechnology articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Telecommunications, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Telecommunications on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TelecommunicationsWikipedia:WikiProject TelecommunicationsTemplate:WikiProject TelecommunicationsTelecommunications articles
Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
The statement that "there can be no 'agreement' between third parties; these agreements are simply 'contracts'" is nonsense. First, any parties can have an agreement. Second, the very definition of "contract" is an agreement between two or more parties.
Although this sentence as given is clearly wrong, I have not stricken or rewritten it because I don't know the author's intention. Perhaps there is a valid point about SLA's that the author was trying to make, but phrased it wrong. I have marked the sentence with a "citation needed" flag for now, but someone who knows more than I about SLA's and third parties should either correct or delete this sentence. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ScribeMonk (talk • contribs) 18:06, 6 June 2022 (UTC)Reply
