![]() | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||
|
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
about inuyasha
I believe that inuyasha shouldn't be capitalized as "InuYasha" but "Inuyasha" because japan doesn't have upper or lower case and the only reason we capitalize inuyasha at all is bcuz we are trying to conform it to our laws of grammar. any thoughts? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 208.71.219.167 (talk) 19:06, 14 April 2008 (UTC)
Vandalism
In case someone hasn't noticed, someone has vandalised this page by continuously referring to homosexuals, Sesshoumaru failing some Mirco-whatever courses, boning Kagome and other nonesense. It won't allow an edit by a user, so can someone fix this problem!
Update: 4:34(EST) January 31st - Someone has once again vandalised the article by typing curse words in random parts of the article. Uptate: "Mokomoko-sama: The fur on Sesshomaru's shoulder can extend it to great lengths, and use it to whip or constrict people. It was once used to knock off some knuckle children that the stuck his penus in ren the Tessaiga out of Inuyasha's hands."
Sort character and history
Uh.. would someone sort out his character and history section? It's way too long and confusing. 24.81.148.147 06:41, 26 December 2005 (UTC)
- I personally think the layout is fine. -Mrpsychic
- Maybe I should section this like I did the Rin article? Sections make reading and editing much easier eh?Tyciol 06:12, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
Picture from anime request
I think there should be a picture of him underneith the manga picture showing how he looks in the anime. I think the manga picture makes him look like a child. -Mrpsychic
- Really? I'd never read it so I wouldn't know... could you find one then? :) Tyciol 04:41, 14 March 2006 (UTC)
- Yea, I have a bunch of pictures of the anime version, I just don't know how to upload. Send an email to [email protected] and I can transfer the picture to you if you know how to do it.
The manga is the first Inuyasha, as such it makes sense to put one from the original. Apparently you haven't read the manga lately, because as of late he has looked anything but childish, and also have you considered, he isn't that old?
Actually Sesshomaru is about 200 years old. Just so you knowSetsuka13 22:17, 11 February 2007 (UTC)setsuka13
I belive Sesshomaru is quite a bit older than 200 years old. In the third movie where he was talking to his father (the movies are non-canon, but the events that occured before InuYasha was sealed to the tree could be considered canon) he looked younger than after InuYasha was sealed to the tree, but he looked older than a child would, so must have been at least 100 years old.
About the picture, I suppose either anime or manga pictures would suit the article, depending on the InuYasha article, but wouldn't it make more sense to edit the pictures so all of them are either manga or anime? Personally, I prefer the anime pictures, and since the anime is fairly faithful to the manga (with some exceptions), I think it would be a good idea to use only anime pictures. Mathew Williams 18:53, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
I think only manga pictures should be used. Not only because they are the originals and the anime is a cheap knock off of the manga, but also because the manga has a much greater production value. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 208.71.219.167 (talk) 19:15, 14 April 2008 (UTC)
Move to unaccented
Is there indeed no accent? Or yeah yeah!does Wikipedia not use accents? I guess I took it for granted there was one, but maybe there wasn't... WhisperToMe? Some guy named Linkdude20002001 seems to be contesting it.Tyciol 06:10, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
Character Picture
I think there should be a picture of him from both the manga and anime, not some fan drawing of him. MrPsychic 02:17, 2 April 2006 (UTC)
- I see there's been a lot of activity switching the picture around. MrPsychic 02:15, 5 April 2006 (UTC)
Picture
Why is his main picture a fanart? Shouldn't it be an official picture?
Why should it? He looks like that, doesn't he? Why is everyone making such a fuss, there's official ones below it, and it's not like you can't recognize him or the artwork isn't well drawn.
Bias and unproved information
Am I the only person who believes that most of Sesshoumaru's article is awfully biased and contains a lot of " information " that has yet to be proved? I honestly do not understand why others have not complained about this yet, ( even though it is listed as an, " article with unsourced information " ) especially since people complain about the slightest bits of bias and false information in Naraku and other character's articles... If people are to take this article seriously, then I suggest carefully editing most of it, because about 50% of it appears to be theories and opinions. False information only misleads fans, and NO wikipedia article will ever look professional unless it is unbiased. I am aware that Sesshoumaru is the favorite character of many, many fans, ( which may be why I am currently the only person who is pointing out all this bias ) but if someone is going to create a true biography / profile about him, then at least make it accurate. I apologize if I seem rude, it is just that I feel biased articles are cheating the readers and they also make the writer(s) seem somewhat immature, in my opinion. Please tell me that Wikipedia is not a biased website... IANS 11:39, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
Please indentify your bias ones. After my opinion, its sources was sufficient, and pretty neat-analytic. Not much character articles do this. If Wikipedia was biased website it would never take three millions dollars donation ~_~
ZAPEROR (talk) 12:30, 23 November 2008 (UTC)
Suggestion in response to Bias and unproved information
The theories in these are well thought out and backed with information that is sensible. A little bias never hurt anyone, and no matter how much you want to make it go away, there will always be bias. Sesshoumaru is a dearly loved character (at least for me ^^) so naturally there will be bias and I have an idea that may satisfy your concern. Perhaps, not to cheat the readers we should split the article into two, one for straight, bald, facts and the other for theories and opinions. Seem fair? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.187.23.50 (talk • contribs)
- Bias is not allowed here. See WP:NPOV. --Zeno McDohl (talk) 03:30, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
What about theories? Hm? Did you even consider my suggestion? Or were you to busy correcting? Hm? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.241.3.234 (talk • contribs)
- You can add it if it has a reliable source. Although I doubt any theories do. --Zeno McDohl (talk) 22:13, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
Name
206.255.24.180 just changed his name, but not the page. I think we should revert to original (Sesshōmaru), but since the user made legit changes it'll be annoying. --Zeno McDohl (talk) 15:05, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
Sesshomaru vs Sesshoumaru
No point using the "correct" Sesshōmaru spelling because using that special "ō" character is a pain. Now Googlefight says Sesshomaru gets 499K hits while Sesshoumaru gets 438K hits. Since Sesshomaru is also shorter, I say we stick to that spelling and give this issue a rest.--Boffob 23:03, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
the true meaning of sesshoumaru's name. I have it on some good sroces(web sites) and from Japanese to English dictionary sesshou = killing and maru = perfection. --TexasTigress 02:09, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
Lady Faith 07:38, 24 October 2007 (UTC)== Tenseiga ==
It seems that the page hasn't been updated about his mastering the meidou zengatsuha with tenseiga MrPsychic 05:01, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
Because he hasn't mastered it yet.--Slotedpig 14:25, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
His mother said he had, plus, at the end of that chapter, the meidou was shown as a full circle. MrPsychic 22:42, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
No she didn't. On page 3 of Chapter 471 SessMom says the Meidou has widened and
the picture of it behind her isn't of a full circle.
He hasn't mastered it.--Slotedpig 23:53, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
I see... You are correct. It's a lot closer though. MrPsychic 06:11, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
I watch InuYasha on Adult Swim here in the USA and in the english language it shows the spelling to be .....Sesshoumaru..... then of course it says who does the voice for Sesshoumaru in englisg and it is David KayeLady Faith 07:38, 24 October 2007 (UTC) Lady Faith October 24, 2007 3:38 am
Sesshoumaru's name should be spelled as I have, with the u, because it is his name. It's the same situation if I wanted to write an article about Sally and spelled it Saly through the whole thing. Names should always be spelled correctly in an encyclopedia. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 208.71.219.167 (talk) 19:19, 14 April 2008 (UTC)
His Missing Arm
So...he's permenantly one-armed in all chapters after the human arm incident? Is that correct? --MitchellTF
- I think that is correct. In the anime, he is one-armed from episode 7 and on, where Inuyasha first uses Tessaiga.Nancysing 21:44, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
You are mostly correct. After the "Human arm incident", the only other time he has two arms is when he plunders the arm of a dragon (Episodes 34-35 {Anime}) to use as a shield against Tessaiga.
Actually in the last chapter released of the manga (Bakusaiga) a new arm appeared, alongside a new sword (Bakusaiga) for him. Accordingly to Totousai's explanation, this happened due to Sesshomaru finally used his full potential, awakening the Daiyoukai inside him, and letting go his father's memento to fight by himself instead of backed up.. 17:08, 22 August 2007 —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 200.189.112.13 (talk)
And the Bakusaiga is good looking sword that has an attack that will stop any enemies body from reforming. The blast has an domino affect. His arm was reformed from his will to fight with his own hands against the enemy, and negative energy of the Scared Jewel, Magatushi. In the end it reformed his left arm and in his hand a sword that Totosai said was always in him. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.90.235.55 (talk) 01:27, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
I have a problem with the note on the bottom that says Sesshoumaru only has stripes on his wrist in the anime. This is not true. He HAD striped wrists, which if you look at the cover of manga volume 7, he CLEARLY has wrist stripes. When the new arm grew in, it did not, however, transfer the stripes. Therefore, it is my belief that only his right wrist has stripes, and the new, left wrist does not have stripes.--71.206.95.37 16:49, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
Companions
Does anyone mind if I change the Companions subsection to a Relationships section like the one that is found here on InuYasha's page? That seems much easier to understand than the current format. -- Nancysing 22:16, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
Nope I don't think anyone minds 65.65.221.244 06:46, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
About the tokijin
shouldent the swords attacks be void now that it is destroyed?--"P-Machine" 05:57, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
- It existed and contributed to Sesshomaru, so it stays.--Oreichalcos (talk) 16:32, 29 March 2008 (UTC)
I thought the father was a wolf demon since dogs are rather domesticated pets that served man while their father.... well I doubt ever served man .... —the preceding comment is by 69.112.43.169 (talk • contribs) 69.112.43.169: Please sign your posts!.
- Dogs aren't naturally domesticated. Even today, wild dogs still exist and live as their ancestors had. Species doesn't have anything to do with servitude. An animal doesn't change its species genetically because of domestication, so your idea has no ground. A wolf is a wolf, and a dog is a dog. --Oreichalcos (talk) 16:32, 29 March 2008 (UTC)
Two categories he may be in...
I pretty much added all the needed categories that Sesshomaru fits in. I was wondering about these two: Category:Fictional magic users and Category:Manga and anime villains. Can someone help me out here? Should these two categories be added at the bottom of the main article? I mean, he does use magic in some shape or form, right? And is he a manga/anime villain? That's what I need to know. Thanks! Power level (Dragon Ball) 02:27, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
- I'm not sure Sesshoumaru belongs in the magic users category since using his own power (youki) isn't the same as using magic (like Tsubaki or Urasue). He's more like a magical creature than a magic user. Sesshoumaru isn't a villain, although he was quite malicious in the beginning. He's more like an anti-hero. --Slotedpig 05:04, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
- Gotta agree with Slotedpig. He's not a magic user (you never see him cast spells or anything), only a magical creature (that is, his nature is "magical"). Same with the villain issue. He did start as a villain and antagonist to Inuyasha and his friends, but has shed that role a long time ago and now he definitely is an antihero.--Boffob 05:42, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
- Cool. Thanks for your comments guys. By the way, are there any other categories I'm missing for him at the bottom then? Power level (Dragon Ball) 17:47, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
I agree. I don't think he belongs in either category, especially not Villain. He's not that bad, lol.--71.206.95.37 16:50, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
His Father?
I was wondering something about his father. Did his father ever show full appearence in the manga, or did they just create a look for him to fit the 3rd movie? And was his father ever named in the manga? CureHeart 18:51, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
No, there has never been a manga "version" of his father. In the manga he is shown in his skeleton form, and as a giant dog carrying a cow away in his jaws, (this was only a flashback by Myoga).
His father's name is Toga. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.220.142.2 (talk) 00:42, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
Sesshomaru vs. Inuyasha
Anyone ever play the Playstation 1 2D Inuyasha fighting game? I did, and to be honest, it sucked. Nevertheless, something I saw in there intrigued me. Namely, Kikyo stating that Inuyasha was actually stronger than Sesshomaru.
Okay, before I continue, let me state that I am a HUGE Sesshomaru fan. Yes, I agree completely, he is very impressive. Far more impressive than his younger brother Inuyasha. Indeed, when I played that Plastation 1 game on my PS2 a while back, I eventually stopped using Sesshomaru because I got tired of playing the whole entire game without ever getting hit. Yes Sesshomaru fans, if you ever come across or play an Inuyasha fighting game, just pick Sesshomaru and you will sail straight to the end of the game without being hit once. I typed a criticism of Sesshomaru on the Inuyasha character page. You can't miss it; its the longest opinion there.
Whatever the case, I would be inclined to disagree with anyone who says that Inuyasha will never surpass Sesshomaru. The main reason I feel this way is because, as with all animes, Inuyasha carries with it a social message that is a big issue in Japan, namely, the plight of biracial children. The character Inuyasha represents pretty much every child in Japan born between a "gaijin" and a Japanese woman. The rejection Inuyasha suffered as a small child is symbolic of the bullying biracial children suffer there. To maintain that Sesshomaru is inherently superior to Inuyasha is to fail to understand the anti-racist message the series has. So, Inuyasha, the half demon (read, symbolically, half Japanese) will never even come close to, or surpass, his brother Sesshomaru, the full demon (read, again symbolically, full Japanese). So, Inuyasha can never outrain being inferior to his brother Sesshomaru. I'm sorry but, given the obviously implied message AGAINST bullying biracial children or treating them as somehow inferior, it simply would not be right if within the show or manga's plot a way wasn't found for Inuyasha to overcome his weakness. Sesshomaru developing "compassion" for his younger brother simply wouldn't be enough, because, that would be a condescending way of saying that the superior, fully Japanese children should show compassion towards the "inferior" half Japanese children because they can't help the fact that they were born inferior. I'm sorry but, when you say "Inuyasha will never train himself to be a full Yokai" that is what I read.
Accuse me of reading to much into it if you like, but, the fact of the matter is Inuyasha does carry a deep social message. One of the best ways to create fantasy is to take a very real social issue, and put a fantasy spin on it. It may indeed be possible that Inuyasha may overcome his demonic side eating away at his soul. Don't forget, Inuyasha is ultimately a fairy tale whose theme is overcoming impossible odds. Not only that, but east Asian fiction is full of heroes who trained themselves to become far stronger than the limits they were born with. I have seen it many times; "he started out as the physically weakest Ninja, but, with time and training he surpassed even the great master...." I have seen that plot device used in countless animes, not the least of which is DBZ.
Take Goku and Vegeta. Vegeta was BORN stronger than Goku. True, they were both Saiyans, and Saiyans get stronger when they heal from injuries. However, even though Goku was born far, far weaker than Vegeta, and whereas a kid Vegeta could wipe out Saiba men, Goku struggled bitterly against King Piccolo, a villain far less powerful (at least at the time) than just one Saiba man. Eventually though, despite having limitations, he surpassed him just on training.
I personally find the idea of "natural ability" as vulgar and downright racist. Determination and dedication, after all, are far more important than talent or natural ability, because, what can I say, the human body and human mind can only go so far. That means that, with time and training, even a seemingly impossible feat to accomplish can be accomplished with enough time and practice. There are natural limits of course, but, it is determination and dedication which ultimately really matter when it comes to going beyond those limits. I will agree with one point though; if you do not have the talent for, say, basketball, and you want to make it to the pros, look forward to LONG HOURS of practice. Generally its best to stick with what you are good at because you learn it faster.
Regarding Inuyasha, well, he HAS overcome ridiculous odds before. Like, for example, slicing off Sesshomaru's left arm, defeating Ryukotsei, and using the wind scar with a broken arm. It may be only a matter of time before he learns to control his demonic side. Having to rely on Tessaiga all the time would not be good, a way would have to be found to learn at least some degree of control over it.
Ultimately though, the whole mythology of Inuyasha is really jacked. For instance, there is no way in HELL (no pun intended) a living Budha would be tricked by a demon into erecting a holy barrier. First of all, second, there is no way IN HELL ANY demon would last very long within that barrier. The more powerful the demon, the more a holy barrier should affect them actually; Sesshomaru should not have even been able to move or walk around within a barrier erected by a Buddha! How to put this in perspective regarding the difference in power?
Let me see here.... A living Buddha is a nuclear bomb. Sesshomaru, in comparison, is a BB gun. Ask any Buddhist; they will tell you the same thing. A truly enlightened being is far, far more powerful than any demon, and more than a match for the likes of Sesshomaru.
Of course, like I said, that whole mythology is pretty jacked up. I only watch it because of Inuyasha's deep philosophical underpinnings. The sexual tension between Kagome and Inuyasha is pretty hilarious also!
later. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 206.63.78.98 (talk) 10:51, 15 February 2007 (UTC).
I agree with the idea that Inuyasha being a half-demon is Rumiko Takahashi's way of hinting at how half-Japanese and other bi-racial people are treated and such, but what's this about the barrier at Mount Hakurai? A living Budda COULD possibly be deceived by a demon into creating a barrier, especially by an evil mastermind like Naraku. After all, Naraku is a master of deception and trickery. When the living Budda (I forgot his name, I think it was Hakushin or something) was alive and a priest, he thought he was practically perfect in that he couldn't think evil thoughts or think ill of others. Naraku proved him wrong by exploiting the small amount of evil in the priest's heart and telling him that the desire to live was normal. Naraku also told the priest to hate the people who buried him alive. About the barrier, though, I'm pretty sure there were holes in the barrier so Naraku and his demons could hide safely within the mountain. This was alluded to several times. Mathew Williams 04:59, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
- Isn't the very idea of quantifying the "power" of a Buddhist Saint's Aura somewhat misguided? A Buddha is not someone with a "huge amount" of "spiritual power", but rather someone who is spiritually awake (that is what the word Buddha actually means). BTW, that makes the deception by Naraku the least convincing point of the whole story; I see no reason why Sesshomarou or even Kikyo would be particularly weakened by such an aura, since in my conception it would simply make them more honest and perceptive about themselves. Sesshomarou would barely be affected by that, as he was indeed. Luis Dantas 03:31, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
Tenseiga and Tokijin
Shouldn't the parts about the Tenseiga's and Tokijin's attacks be removed from this article? I think it makes more sense to move them to their own articles (the Tenseiga and Tokijin articles). The swords may use some or most of Sesshomaru's power, but they have their own power as well, and Sesshomaru is probably unable to use attacks such as the Dragon Strike unarmed. That's why I think the sections should be moved. This has already been done with Tessaiga, and the Tessaiga's attacks are not in Inuyasha's article. Mathew Williams 04:48, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
There has been no response to this, so I am letting you know in advance that I am removing the Tokijn and Tenseiga attacks from this article. The inclusion of these attacks makes the article appear cluttered, and is redundant. They already have their own articles. Maybe there a should be a mention of Tokijin and Tenseiga with links provided at the top of the attacks section, much like the Inuyasha article in regards to Tessaiga. Mathew Williams 07:09, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
- Sounds good to me--88wolfmaster 03:19, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
Fluffy bandolier thing
Does anybody know what the thing on his shoulder is? --Count Mall 01:40, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
- The character book says its part of his body. --Slotedpig 03:12, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
- Which is really weird, given that we, at different times, see the beginning and end of it at the same time. We call it mokomoko-sama or the Fluffy, by the way. Mokomoko-sama is something Takahashi called it... and, BTW, who wrote the character book? 74.70.7.38 17:06, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
- You can only see the ends in the anime. That's a mistake. The character book was released by Sunrise/Viz which RT approved of. --Slotedpig 23:07, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
- How do you know it's a mistake? Takahashi also added input to the anime--an anime that bears more proof of what the mokomoko-sama is, given that, as you put it, Takahashi only approved of a character book, as opposed to being proof in one of InuYasha's incarnations. I'm only saying, that in terms of 'authenticity' or 'canon', the anime should come out superior over something Takahashi just 'approved' of. 74.70.7.38 04:49, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
- You can only see the ends in the anime. That's a mistake. The character book was released by Sunrise/Viz which RT approved of. --Slotedpig 23:07, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
- Only not. RT has nothing to do with the anime. The animators changed all kinds of things in the anime. They don't need RT's approval to do that. The anime is not superior to the character book either, since it uses RT's own descriptions of the characters not the anime's interpertation.--Slotedpig 13:12, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
Slotedpig is correct. The anime is not canon. The anime contains many things that never actually happened. Same with the movies. Viz contains the right to animate the series, therefore they are allowed to do things as long as Takahashi-san approves. And btw, I read in the book that VIZ admitted that certain things were a mistake and it was too late to correct, such as the mokomoko-sama thing... And the theory is that mokomoko-sama is Sesshoumaru's tail, in his human form.--71.206.95.37 16:57, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
Accually, Sunrise animates InuYasha. VIZ dubs the anime and releases it in North America. -Sango4ever, 28 October 2007 —Preceding comment was added at 23:01, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
Rewrite growing compassions section
Let me say this right away: the Examples of his growing compassion section needs to be rewritten or spliced into other sections. It sticks out as a sore thumb, and completely lowers the articles quality. I'd have less qualms with it, if the information presented in it got rewritten into a character history or biography, and only the key points of the section stayed in it, but it sticks out negatively. 74.70.7.38 05:28, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
Preparation for addition of detailed Bakusaiga information.
Are we gonna keep it here until it merits its own article? --Starks 19:23, 20 August 2007 (UTC)
- Seeing how there's still not enough information for it to have its own article, it's best to leave it here. The most an informative Bakusaiga article would contain is 1-2 paragraphs, for now. I believe that unless the weapon gains several techniques and/or a history behind it is revealed, then it should stay in the Sesshomaru article for awhile: it's better to have a small informative summary here, than creating an article which would mostly contain excessive plot information of each time the sword is used. DarkAngel007 03:07, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
- Can we do a redirect for Bakusaiga to the Sesshoumaru page until then? --Starks 01:37, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
- Done. ^_^ DarkAngel007 01:39, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
I really think that Bakusaiga will need a picture. I am more than willing to provide since I bought my issue of Shounen Sunday early yesterday (I scanlate Inuyasha). What worries me though is whether adding a picture to the main article will disrupt the balance and harmony of its layout. I do believe that chapter 518 has given us enough to work with and a split may be order. --Starks 08:56, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
-Maybe you could wait until the next chapter? It could provide a bit more info... —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 74.103.18.72 (talk) 14:12, August 22, 2007 (UTC)
After reading the recent chapter update on Inuyasha Companion I got an idea for handling the development on this site for the Bakusaiga that for the moment there is not enough information and until more details are collected then I will support that there will be not be a seperate article until the possibility arises that there is enough material for a seperate article. -Adv193 00:18, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
- At any rate, a picture would be nice. If you want a picture, I'll crop and resize one. Or if someone else wants to do it, grab a scanlation for 518 from my site and see if you can do better. --Starks 04:41, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
- Had to remove your link. No offense, but links to scanlation sites for licensed material are just not allowed in Wikipedia.
- Anyways, so were agreed here that making a separate Bakusaiga article is superfluous (that is until a long history/explanation for it is revealed and some more times passes by after its use - at the least).
- And a picture wouldn't disrupt the article's layout, so your welcome to add a picture (just not one with scanlated words - erase the words if possible >.<. It's alright if it does have words, just that the image would last longer if it didn't - I guess it's preferable that way). DarkAngel007 04:56, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
- I have a cleaned raw I can use. How big should the cropped and resized picture be? --Starks 05:47, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
Well, a big picture isn't necessary so any image with dimensions below 500px (or 400px) is good - it'll be resized to fit in the section anyways. DarkAngel007 05:53, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
- Picture added. If a better one shows up next week or later, I'll replace it. --Starks 07:57, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
I think the picture on page 7 or 8(not sure)of scans is a better pic for Bakusaiga...also Magatsuhi isnt exactly Naraku's offspring...can sum1 edit that? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.184.1.104 (talk) 13:11, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
Yes, someone should edit that phrase, Magatsuhi is not Naraku's offspring, he merely borrowed body parts from Naruku. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.122.167.17 (talk) 22:56, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
Poison Claws vs. Dokkusou
Seems to be the only thing of debate lately other than silly vandalism. Which way should it be left? - Desirsar, 3 April 2008 —Preceding unsigned comment added by Desirsar (talk • contribs) 11:36, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
While fans of the series probably know what Dokkusou means and what attack it is, it might be better to change it to Poison Claws/Talons for people who are either new or are just browsing. Using Dokkusou is in a sense using jargon. Not everyone knows what it means, so they get left out of the loop.
Also, the Japanese words in articles is a little agitating. Same issue. Not everyone knows what "yokai" or "hanyo" means, even if we do. It's more like fan-Japanese than true Japanese anyway, with fans insisting on using words in the wrong context. Sorry to rant, but people using the words without knowing the language and then using them in places where everyone can see is annoying to me. And, no, I don't speak Japanese myself, but I speak other languages and have observed very similar phenomena. Punk reader 20:30, 29 July 2008 (UTC)
Small things
What does 'saiga' or 'seiga' mean? Is that fang? I was reading that both swords have the last word with either spelling (not just with Wiki) and I was curious. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.217.47.204 (talk) 03:57, 30 July 2008 (UTC)
Can somebody fix the page?
I would fix the page, but my TW isn't working for some reason. D: ムーカオズルール(Talk to Moo) 23:26, 25 December 2008 (UTC)
Don't Delete.
The contents of this page were removed by vandals, and now my TW isn't working (as mentioned above[broken anchor]), and I cannot revert the edit. ムーカオズルール(Talk to Moo) 23:29, 25 December 2008 (UTC)
This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |