Talk:Seth Godin/Archives/2013
Latest comment: 11 years ago by Heenan73 in topic Not encyclopedic
 | This is an archive of past discussions about Seth Godin. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Not encyclopedic
"Seth Godin is known for a very visual, personal, and dynamic speaking style that has earned him a large following." This doesn't seem particularly encyclopaedic. WhiteCat 01:28, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
- It's been deleted -- SiobhanHansa 13:22, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
- I'm reading his "Purple Cow" book now. The writing styles in this book and the wikipedia article look very very similar... beyond that I'm not making any accusations.220.76.15.114 (talk) 17:29, 2 May 2009 (UTC)
With respect, all this is beside the point. If Wikipedia is in any way a 'Who's Who', which I believe it is, Seth Godin is more than qualified to have an entry. Besides, the information he supplies is of invaluable help to a person setting up a website in order to promote his or her novel. Wikipedia is an encyclopaedia, not only of facts, but of personalities[citation needed]; that is the point.Tony Sheppard (talk) 13:34, 27 October 2009 (UTC)
- With respect to autobiography, wikipedia has a policy and this article would appear to be in violation 79.176.119.30 (talk) 11:57, 14 February 2010 (UTC)
- This article reads more like a CV than a wikipedia article. What job is he going for? Heenan73 (talk) 14:33, 20 May 2013 (UTC)