Talk:Seven Soldiers of Victory

Justice League Unlimited

{{spoilers}} I've heard in a recent episode of Justice League Unlimited that aired in the UK that Speedy appeared along with the other Seven Soldiers of Victory. Should this be noted?

WikiProject Comics B-Class Assesment required

This article needs the B-Class checklist filled in to remain a B-Class article for the Comics WikiProject. If the checklist is not filled in by 7th August this article will be re-assessed as C-Class. The checklist should be filled out referencing the guidance given at Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Assessment/B-Class criteria. For further details please contact the Comics WikiProject. Comics-awb (talk) 17:26, 31 July 2008 (UTC)

Done. I gave it a C because the coverage is heavily in-universe and there is a lot missing on background, reception, etc. I think it will be difficult to manage with the current structure and the solution seems to be to split this into two articles. We did this for Guardians of the Galaxy when they launched a radically different team and it has set things up nicely. Given that the Morrrison's Seven Soldiers run is done we have plenty of interviews and reviews we can draw on and I can dig out the sales figures.

So thoughts on a split? (Emperor (talk) 02:15, 3 November 2008 (UTC))

Seven Soldiers

The section on Seven Soldiers (and related information in other sections) should be split into its own article (also titled Seven Soldiers) because Seven Soldiers is unique enough from "Seven Soldiers of Victory" that this placement is justified and notable enough (written by Grant Morrison, won an Eisner) to deserve its own article.--Marcus Brute (talk) 19:29, 31 December 2008 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Seven Soldiers of Victory. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100625003119/http://www.majorspoilers.com/archives/42515.htm/ to http://www.majorspoilers.com/archives/42515.htm/
• Added {{dead link}} tag to http://forum.newsarama.com/showthread.php?threadid=26641
• Added {{dead link}} tag to http://forum.newsarama.com/showthread.php?threadid=21568
• Added {{dead link}} tag to http://forum.newsarama.com/showthread.php?threadid=28040
• Added {{dead link}} tag to http://forum.newsarama.com/showthread.php?threadid=31083
• Added archive https://archive.is/20130710030518/http://www.dcindexes.com/features/database.php?site=&pagetype=character&id=145 to http://www.dcindexes.com/features/database.php?site=&pagetype=character&id=145

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:34, 20 December 2017 (UTC)