Talk:Seven management and planning tools
Latest comment: 9 years ago by DanielPenfield in topic Caps and lack of italicisation don't add up
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Duplicate
editThis is a duplicate of Seven management and planning tools.
I'm new to editing on Wikipedia and capatilized the title of this article. It prevents the search 'seven management and planning tools' from working.
I've recommended that this article be deleted. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Jdtoellner (talk • contribs) .
- I've fixed this by making "Seven management and planning tools" redirect to Seven Management and Planning Tools. This means that if anyone goes to the Seven management and planning tools article (say by searching for "seven management and planning tools") they will instead end up at Seven Management and Planning Tools. Anyone can create a redirect, in this case I edited the page to contain #REDIRECT [[Seven Management and Planning Tools]]. Best, Gwernol 21:58, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
Caps and lack of italicisation don't add up
editThe title is either a widely accepted concept or strategy (article name should be downcased), or it's the title of a website or a book (article name should be italicised). It can't be both, or if it is, it would be more normal to downcase unless someone "owns" them. Can someone say which, please? Tony (talk) 15:24, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
- It's neither. It's actually an echo of what appears in textbooks on the subject of quality control/quality assurance/quality management—see [1], [2], [3], [4], for example. (This capitalization is admittedly not universal.) It's as if the authors regard it as a proper noun ("Not just any seven. THE Seven!") -- DanielPenfield (talk) 16:36, 25 April 2015 (UTC)