Talk:Seventh-day Adventist education

Seventh-day Adventist Church High‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Seventh-day Adventist Church, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Seventh-day Adventist Church on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Seventh-day Adventist ChurchWikipedia:WikiProject Seventh-day Adventist ChurchTemplate:WikiProject Seventh-day Adventist ChurchSeventh-day Adventist Church articles

High

This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

To-do list:
edit history watch purge Expand "Glacier View Controversy" section, to include more background, history, theological issues, and details of the Glacier View meeting itself Add to "Adventist Responses to Criticisms" section, ideally with material from Adventist scholars etc.

Education High‑importance

	Education portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Education, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of education and education-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EducationWikipedia:WikiProject EducationTemplate:WikiProject Educationeducation articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

POV

Latest comment: 12 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

I recently moved some large portions of material from the Progressive Adventism page, so the POV may be a little lopsided currently. I invite other editors to assist its neutrality by contributing content. Colin MacLaurin 12:28, 26 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

This reads like a list of petty grievances rather than an article about Seventh Day Adventist Education. Sections are missing, and the controversy/negative point of view is presented first, as if that is the only information available on collegiate SDA Education. I'm welcoming others to add useful and relevant input as well, and I suggest creating a controversy section at the end where the grievances (and opposing views?) can be moved. Soliciting feedback on this reorganization of the page.Djneufville (talk) 11:09, 19 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

I would suggest labeling the president Jamaican American. Her family came from Jamaica, not Africa, and many Jamaicans self-identify as a separate community. To remove ambiguity 'person of African descent' could be used, which would both signify similarity, and not confuse her with the older community of the United States. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.94.169.151 (talk) 06:10, 22 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

Add topic