Talk:Sex Ed (The Office)

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Sex Ed (The Office)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Khazar2 (talk · contribs) 11:56, 20 October 2013 (UTC)

Hey Gen Quon, I'll be happy to take this one. Comments to follow shortly. Thanks in advance for your work on it! -- Khazar2 (talk) 11:56, 20 October 2013 (UTC)

• Could you give a bit more context about who Nate is (the character, not the actor)? You mention that he's introduced as a character, but not what position/role he has in the office.

Otherwise, this looks good on first pass; I'll move on to the checklist in a moment. -- Khazar2 (talk) 12:12, 20 October 2013 (UTC)

Checklist

Rate	Attribute	Review Comment
1. Well-written:
	1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct.	Spotchecks and Copyvio Detector show no issues with copyright in prose.
	1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation.
2. Verifiable with no original research:
	2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline.
	2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose).
	2c. it contains no original research.
3. Broad in its coverage:
	3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic.	A bit more information about Nate would be helpful, but not necessary for passage, I think (not a main aspect).
	3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style).
	4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.
	5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:
	6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content.
	6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.
	7. Overall assessment.	Pass as GA

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Sex Ed (The Office). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110121015018/http://www.avclub.com/milwaukee/articles/milwaukees-mark-kenny-strasser-proksch-to-appear-t%2C46316/ to http://www.avclub.com/milwaukee/articles/milwaukees-mark-kenny-strasser-proksch-to-appear-t%2C46316/
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.nbc.com/The_Office/video/sex-ed-clip-one/1254512/
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101017022226/http://tvbythenumbers.com/2010/10/15/thursday-finals-the-big-bang-theory-30-rock-the-office-outsourced-greys-anatomy-fringe-all-adjusted-up/68224 to http://tvbythenumbers.com/2010/10/15/thursday-finals-the-big-bang-theory-30-rock-the-office-outsourced-greys-anatomy-fringe-all-adjusted-up/68224
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.nbc.com/the-office/episode-guide/season-7/42801/sex-ed/episode-704/47922/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:34, 19 June 2017 (UTC)