Talk:Sex Ed 120%
Latest comment: 2 years ago by Theleekycauldron in topic Did you know nomination
 | A fact from Sex Ed 120% appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 7 December 2021 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|  |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Did you know nomination
edit- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Theleekycauldron (talk) 08:18, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
( )
- ... that critics complained about the manga Sex Ed 120% being given a "Mature" rating by its English-language publisher...? Source: Multiple reviews state this view. (Anime UK News, Comic Book Resources, Anime News Network)
- ALT1: ... that the manga Sex Ed 120% teaches about masturbation, safe sex and consent...? Source: "There is nothing explicit in this book beyond frank discussions of genitals, masturbation, and safe sex" (Anime News Network); "Perhaps the best section in this volume is in the consent chapter." (Anime UK News)
Created by ISD (talk). Self-nominated at 21:17, 24 November 2021 (UTC).
| General: Article is new enough and long enough |
|---|
Policy compliance:
- Adequate sourcing:
- Neutral:
- Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:
- Earwig picks up some phrases in common with the Anime UK News review. They should be easy enough to rephrase, though.
Hook eligibility:
- Cited: - Apologies for being picky, but safe sex isn't the same as birth control. Based on the cited sources, the latter should be replaced with the former in ALT1. This appears to be an issue in the in-article synopsis as well, but again, it's minor and should be a quick fix.
- Interesting:
| QPQ: Done. |
Overall: 
Based on the reviews, this seems like a fantastic manga! (I also learned the word edutainment, which is neat.) Just need a few quick fixes, then be sure to ping me and I'll approve this! ezlev (user/tlk/ctrbs) 06:41, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
- @Ezlev: Hi there. I've made some changes to the article and hooks, but I'm not sure if they are enough. I'm sure you will correct me if I'm wrong. ISD (talk) 10:59, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
Good to go! Great job, ISD. ezlev (user/tlk/ctrbs) 18:44, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
- @Ezlev: Thank you very much. ISD (talk) 19:40, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
