Talk:Sexological testing

Psychology Mid‑importance

	Psychology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Psychology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PsychologyWikipedia:WikiProject PsychologyTemplate:WikiProject Psychologypsychology articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Sexology and sexuality High‑importance

	Human sexuality portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sexology and sexuality, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of human sexuality on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Sexology and sexualityWikipedia:WikiProject Sexology and sexualityTemplate:WikiProject Sexology and sexualitySexology and sexuality articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

Latest comment: 16 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

Since English is not my mother language I invite you to correct the spelling errors if there were any. Many thanks.

--Trevinci (talk) 17:16, 26 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

My main suggestion would be to explain what differentiates a page on "sexological testing" from a "list of sexological (etc.) tests". Perhaps some historical perspective on testing and current general practices? --chrylis (talk) 16:12, 27 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

Good idea. I will work about. Thanks. --Trevinci (talk) 07:25, 1 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

Disclosure

Latest comment: 15 years ago6 comments2 people in discussion

I have added an entry to the main page. The author of the linked document (but not the scale) is a colleague of mine with whom I have published research articles. I though it appropriate to indicate that here.
— James Cantor (talk) 18:03, 15 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

Very good job James. Many thanks for your perfect contribution.

For other contributors: please, respect the alpha order and the precision of the bibliography. Thanks however.

I believe that the Expert|Tag of August 2008 can be removed.

Who can make the removal?

— Trevinci (talk) 08:55, 19 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

Thank you for your very kind words, Trevinci.
I agree that the expert tag is unneeded. Anyone may remove it; it can always be discussed and re-added, if other editors disagree.
— James Cantor (talk) 12:28, 19 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

Ok, having the accord of an expert as James, I try to remove the Tag.

If others editors don't agree... it is possible to speak about? Many thanks.

Ubi major minor cessat

— Trevinci (talk) 18:09, 20 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

I have added an external link to the main page: http://individual.utoronto.ca/ray_blanchard/index_files/Phallometry_Lecture.html Phallometry in Research and Clinical Diagnosis by Dr. Ray Blanchard. Because the author of the linked document is again a colleague, I thought it appropriate to indicate that here.— James Cantor (talk) 21:50, 4 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

Very interesting link James, and thanks for this specification.

Ciao

—Trevinci (talk) 12:03, 4 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

Add topic