Talk:Shades of Purple

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Please don't make "shades of purple" automatically direct here.

edit

I'm looking for actual shades of purple, like all the other colors have their own shades pages. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.17.134.7 (talk) 21:28, 2 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

GA Review

edit
GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:Shades of Purple/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Hawkeye7 (talk · contribs) 21:30, 5 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

  1. Is it well written?
    A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:  
    Corrected one typographical error
    B. It complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation:  
  2. Is it verifiable with no original research?
    A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:  
    B. All in-line citations are from reliable sources, including those for direct quotations, statistics, published opinion, counter-intuitive or controversial statements that are challenged or likely to be challenged, and contentious material relating to living persons—science-based articles should follow the scientific citation guidelines:  
    See below
    C. It contains no original research:  
    D. It contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism:  
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:  
    B. It stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style):  
  4. Is it neutral?
    It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:  
  5. Is it stable?
    It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:  
  6. Is it illustrated, if possible, by images?
    A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:  
    Two album covers with fair use tags
    B. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:  
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:  
    All looks pretty good. A couple of questions below


Comments

All looks pretty good. Just a couple of questions:

  1. When did Marion Ravn become Raven?
  2. I'm a little concerned about footnote 3. Was it once online?

Hawkeye7 (talk) 03:42, 6 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

  • Hi again Hawkeye7. Thanks for this review as well. In response to your comments:
  1. I'm not sure what you're saying here. Her birth name is Ravn, but she's always been known as Raven in English speaking countries, and accordingly her article on the English wikipedia is Marion Raven.
  2. No. I got the article off ProQuest via my University's online library search function. I did note, however, that I made a mistage in the references page number, which I have now fixed. I can email you the reference in PDF format if you like.
Let me know if I need to do anything else. Freikorp (talk) 04:13, 6 January 2017 (UTC)Reply
That should do. Hawkeye7 (talk) 07:55, 6 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

Covers and other languages

edit

Not sure if covers of songs on this album should be included, but I've recently discovered that 'The Day You Went Away' has been covered by both Cyndi Wang and Orange Caramel. Can't find a reliable source for either yet though. Also Krissy & Ericka covered "Don't Say You Love Me"; there's a reliable source for that at the single's article.

I know M2M recorded a Mandarin version of 'Pretty Boy' and a Spanish version of 'Everything You Do' (they both appear on the 'best of' album [1] though I'm not sure when they were recorded, or if there are reliable sources that they were recorded in preperation/promotion for Shades of Purple. Freikorp (talk) 01:06, 28 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 12 external links on Shades of Purple. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:43, 22 December 2017 (UTC)Reply