Talk:Shadow square

Latest comment: 2 years ago by MitchB323 in topic Peer Review

Adding more information about how they were used, such as were they used for astronomical calculations or perhaps engineering calculations? would help considerably. A picture to give the reader an idea of what they looked like would help as well. what were they replaced by or what did they lead to? Were they a significant scientific instrument or just a small piece to aid in astrolabe usage?Ender0051 (talk) 20:33, 13 September 2013 (UTC)Reply

Possible sources of information

edit

http://www.muslimheritage.com/topics/default.cfm?ArticleID=529

http://www.outreachworld.org/Files/umichigan_cmenas/Astrolabe.pdf

http://catalogue.museogalileo.it/indepth/ShadowSquare.html

I am going to work on this page, if there are any other suggestions for sources to look at while updating it, please post them.

Keelanca (talk) 20:27, 16 February 2014 (UTC)Reply

Peer Review

edit

I liked the overall organization of the article. You had some solid information. I agree that adding a picture would help the reader get a feel for what the shadow square is. I think you could also add why this invention was so important, and maybe how long it was a relevant tool. It is definitely a good first draft though. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Comb7190 (talkcontribs) 02:26, 31 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

I agree that there is good information and organization in the article. I think a important addition to this article would be more information about the tool's relevance in the scientific community. A timeline of its use and contribution to important scientific observations/discoveries could be helpful in understanding its importance as well. Adding more info regarding its origin and creation would be good to add if possible. MitchB323 (talk) 18:28, 18 February 2022 (UTC)Reply