Talk:Shag Times/GA1

GA Reassessment

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
This article is undergoing a Good Article Reassessment as part of the Good Article sweeps. Looking through the article, I had a few concerns:

1. There is no information about sales figures or chart performance (if any).
2. There is no list of Personnel, which members of the Album project have informed me are essential for GA class.
3. There seems to be a lot of assumed knowledge. I can follow the JAMs to KLF transition, but should I know who The Timelords and Disco 2000 are?
4. According to the infobox, it seems to be released by KLF Communications. Could something about this apparently newly created label be included in the "Context" section?
5. The "Reviews" section seems really short. Did only two reviewers comment on it?
6. In the Q Magazine review, it says that the album helped reopen a debate about creative ownership, but this article doesn't mention anything about that.
7. The non free-use rationale template should be used for the image of the album cover.
8. Stating in the footnotes that Longmire's work is "the authoritative KLF discography on the internet" seems like point of view.

I will place this reassessment on hold for one week to allow for these concerns to be addressed. If this can be completed within seven days, I will continue with an examination of the prose. If not, the article will be delisted. Best wishes, GaryColemanFan (talk) 20:25, 8 November 2009 (UTC)

No progress has been made, so I am delisting this article. GaryColemanFan (talk) 23:01, 15 November 2009 (UTC)