This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Robotics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Robotics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RoboticsWikipedia:WikiProject RoboticsTemplate:WikiProject RoboticsRobotics articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Technology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TechnologyWikipedia:WikiProject TechnologyTemplate:WikiProject TechnologyTechnology articles
Latest comment: 1 year ago4 comments2 people in discussion
The Shahed 136 has a bigger page due to the available published information on it, yet the two drones are extremely similar, especially over the internet. I propose the two pages be merged, turning the 136 page into Shahed Suicide Drones. This will allow provisions for the Arrash to be included as well, which may not have voluminous information available like the 136. Anthropophoca (talk) 02:01, 10 December 2022 (UTC)Reply
Oppose - Per WP:NAIR, "An aircraft is generally notable if it is verifiably — through reliable sources — a distinct 'type'." I see no reason to merge articles on different aircraft types. Perhaps a list article with links to the individual types would be a good alternative to merging. - ZLEAT\C16:09, 10 December 2022 (UTC)Reply
That's still not a very good reason to merge it with Shahed 136. Shahed 136 is a notable topic with a decently sized article, so merging it into a list does not make much sense. As far as we know, there is no relation between the Shahed 131 and 136 other than basic layout and role, so merging the two wouldn't make much sense from that perspective either. As a wise Wikipedian once said, do not confuse stub status with non-notability. - ZLEAT\C02:01, 12 December 2022 (UTC)Reply