Talk:Shaheed Ganj Mosque

Latest comment: 8 years ago by Cyberbot II in topic External links modified

Neutrality and possibly unreliable sources

edit

@Delljvc and Nestwiki: (Pinging article contributors)

I've tagged the reference [1] as a possibly unreliable one, since the website (in general) seems to be highly biased against India and the article cited seems anti-Sikh, and doesn't provide any reference itself about where it itself got the information from. Since the events concerned happened more than half a century ago, this clearly isn't a primary, or even a secondary source.

If noone objects to this, I will (some time in the future) remove the reference and any information cited from this reference that cannot be verified from reliable references.

Best regards--Siddhartha Ghai (talk) 20:16, 26 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Shaheed Ganj Mosque. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 10:19, 26 February 2016 (UTC)Reply