Talk:Shahram Jazayeri

Bot report : Found duplicate references !

In the last revision I edited, I found duplicate named references, i.e. references sharing the same name, but not having the same content. Please check them, as I am not able to fix them automatically :)

• "ref" :
  • [http://www.iraneconomist.com/ Iraneconomist.com<!-- Bot generated title -->]
  • [http://web.archive.org/web/20070310031907/http://www.ansarnews.com/?usr=news/detail&nid=749 :: ansarnews ::<!-- Bot generated title -->]

DumZiBoT (talk) 18:45, 12 August 2008 (UTC)

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion:

• Shahram Jazayeri2.jpg

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 15:51, 31 July 2018 (UTC)

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:

• Shahram jazaery arab 2016.jpeg.jpg

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 23:52, 19 April 2020 (UTC)

Intro should be change

The title must be changed "because reuters source is for at least 12 years ago and after he got "full innocence of the alleged disruption of the economic system by branches of the Supreme Court" and covered that news by Tasnim (which related to Iran government) in 2015, that title and the charge is invalid (in Persian called: برائت)" That means he wasn't involved in a high-profile corruption case. and you must focus on the latest news and the decision of the Supreme Court of Iran.

AlexMawi (talk) 21:54, 4 May 2020 (UTC)AlexMaviAlexMawi (talk) 21:54, 4 May 2020 (UTC)

He was involved in a high-profile corruption case and his trials were televised in Iran. The source for this, Reuters is listed reliable in Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Perennial sources#Sources, and it does not matter when the story was published. Pahlevun (talk) 22:01, 4 May 2020 (UTC)

as I told a hundred times before Reuters source is for 12 years ago!!! you should pay on the latest news. if you can't read Persian that's not our problem use google translate lol

https://www.tasnimnews.com/fa/news/1394/09/23/942049/%D8%B4%D9%87%D8%B1%D8%A7%D9%85-%D8%AC%D8%B2%D8%A7%DB%8C%D8%B1%DB%8C-%D9%85%D9%87%D8%AF%DB%8C-%D9%87%D8%A7%D8%B4%D9%85%DB%8C-%D9%87%D9%85%D8%A7%D9%86-%D8%AC%D8%A7%DB%8C%DB%8C-%D8%A7%D8%B3%D8%AA-%DA%A9%D9%87-%D9%85%D9%86-%D8%A8%D9%88%D8%AF%D9%85 AlexMawi (talk) 06:17, 5 May 2020 (UTC)AlexMavi

Can you address a guideline that tells a reliable source published more than a decade ago is unreliable? Per Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Perennial sources, The Washington Times is better to be avoided especially when a more reliable source is available. Moreover, the figure mentioned by RFE/RL is an official estimate (which you previously deemed as reliable). Tasnim News Agency link is an interview, and everything there is solely a claim made by Jazayeri. Pahlevun (talk) 21:26, 5 May 2020 (UTC)

WashingtonTimes is more reliable source especially when rfel wrote false information about his impression. ok, that was interview how about this: https://www.magiran.com/article/1359235 also :

https://donya-e-eqtesad.com/%D8%A8%D8%AE%D8%B4-%D8%B3%D8%A7%DB%8C%D8%AA-%D8%AE%D9%88%D8%A7%D9%86-62/3353912-%D8%B4%D9%87%D8%B1%D8%A7%D9%85-%D8%AC%D8%B2%D8%A7%DB%8C%D8%B1%DB%8C-%D8%A7%D8%B2-%D8%AC%D8%B2%D8%A6%DB%8C%D8%A7%D8%AA-%D8%B3%D8%A7%D8%AE%D8%AA-%D9%81%DB%8C%D9%84%D9%85-%D8%B2%D9%86%D8%AF%DA%AF%DB%8C-%D8%A7%D8%B4-%D9%85%DB%8C-%DA%AF%D9%88%DB%8C%D8%AF AlexMawi (talk) 06:29, 6 May 2020 (UTC)AlexMavi