Talk:Shalmaneser IV

Latest comment: 2 years ago by Ichthyovenator in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit
GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:Shalmaneser IV/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Cerebellum (talk · contribs) 03:03, 9 January 2022 (UTC)Reply


Hello! I'll be reviewing this article. --Cerebellum (talk) 03:03, 9 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Okay, all done! Nice little article, I'm happy to pass as GA. I have two minor comments on the references below but this definitely means the criteria. --Cerebellum (talk) 14:16, 9 January 2022 (UTC)Reply
@Cerebellum: Thank you for reviewing! I've amended the article per the two comments. Ichthyovenator (talk) 14:49, 9 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Criteria

edit
  • Prose: Article is well written and complies with the MOS.
  • References: Article is thoroughly referenced to high-quality modern sources. There are two occurrences of citation #1 in the lead, I think just one after the parentheses would suffice. Spotchecked refs #1 and #s 9-12. For ref #9, did you mean page 155? On that page in the PDF I see, “Belonging to Hama, queen of Shalmaneser, king of Assyria, daughter-in-law of Adad-nerari," I didn't see the info on page 158.
Yes, looking over it again I messed up the page number here. Ichthyovenator (talk) 14:49, 9 January 2022 (UTC)Reply
  • Coverage: Yes, article seems to cover what is known about this king's reign in an appropriate level of detail, you didn't add extra background info just to pad the article length.
  • Neutral: Yes.
  • Stable: Yes.
  • Illustrated: Yes, the image is appropriately tagged and captioned. --Cerebellum (talk) 14:16, 9 January 2022 (UTC)Reply