Talk:Shap Stone Avenue

	North West England portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lancashire and Cumbria, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Lancashire and Cumbria on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Lancashire and CumbriaWikipedia:WikiProject Lancashire and CumbriaTemplate:WikiProject Lancashire and CumbriaLancashire and Cumbria
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Architecture Low‑importance

	Architecture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Archaeology

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Archaeology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Archaeology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchaeologyWikipedia:WikiProject ArchaeologyTemplate:WikiProject ArchaeologyArchaeology
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Historic sites

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Historic sites, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of historic sites on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Historic sitesWikipedia:WikiProject Historic sitesTemplate:WikiProject Historic sitesHistoric sites
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Neopaganism

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Neopaganism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Neopaganism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NeopaganismWikipedia:WikiProject NeopaganismTemplate:WikiProject NeopaganismNeopaganism
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Stub pages concerning the same site

Latest comment: 11 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion

We seems to have four tiny stub pages here – Kemp Howe, Hill of Skulls, Thunder Stone, and Goggleby Stone – which all seem to be parts of the same complex. I can't help thinking that it would better if all four pages were merged to a common page. Pasicles (talk) 18:53, 15 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

Right, I've decided to be bold, and I've merged Hill of Skulls, Thunder Stone, and Goggleby Stone to this page. I'm assuming that "Kemp Howe" is a preferred name for describing this complex. Pasicles (talk) 19:48, 15 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

Kemp Howe merging

Latest comment: 11 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

Hi, Pasicles, I'm thinking that your merging of the various stubs (Goggleby, Thunderstone, etc. ) into one page was a very good idea as they seem to form parts of one megalithic complex. However, looking at the relevant sources (eg: Barrowclough, Clare) I'm pretty sure that Kemp Howe isn't used as the name of the complex (although it may have been the terminus for the Southern Shap Avenue set of stones). Burl and Clare seem to think that Skellaw Hill was the focus of the avenues of stones. (Clare doesn't even name Kemp Howe, he just lumps everything under "Shap"). Barrowclough calls the whole thing the "Shap Complex", which starts in the north at the Thunderstone and ends up at the Kemp Howe circle in the south. We could call the page the "Shap Complex" or maybe the "Shap Avenue complex". Neither is very satisfactory, but I prefer the second as the "Shap Complex" sounds like a psychological condition. What do you think? I can re-arrange and expand the page if you you agree. Thanks, Laplacemat (talk) 10:51, 4 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

Hi Laplacemat. Yes I wasn't very sure about this. "Kemp Howe" seems to be the name of a farm near the stone circle, rather than the complex itself. On the other hand, James Dyer's Discovering Prehistoric England does list the site under "Kemp Howe, Shap", which is why I tentatively left it. I've had another look at various books, and I agree that there doesn't seem to be a single unified name, which is a bit of a problem. All things considered, I think that "Shap Avenue complex" is perhaps the best option - so if you want to move the page to that, and expand it, you have my best wishes! Pasicles (talk) 13:51, 12 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

O.k., Pasicles, thanks for your understanding. I'll see what I can do under the title "Shap Avenue Complex". Laplacemat (talk) 16:30, 12 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

Add topic