Talk:Shaqa'iq al-Utrunj fi Raqa'iq al-Ghunj
Latest comment: 3 years ago by Jack Frost in topic Requested move 30 June 2021
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
On 30 June 2021, it was proposed that this article be moved to Shaqāʾiq al-Utrunj. The result of the discussion was no consensus. |
Requested move 30 June 2021
edit- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: no consensus. Despite the discussion being open for 5 weeks, no consensus has formed as to whether or not the page should be moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) Jack Frost (talk) 03:29, 8 August 2021 (UTC)
Shaqāʾiq al-utrunj fī raqāʾiq al-ghunj → Shaqāʾiq al-Utrunj – WP:SUBTITLE 146.251.194.58 (talk) 17:35, 29 June 2021 (UTC) —Relisting. Colonestarrice (talk) 12:24, 30 July 2021 (UTC)
- @Lennart97 and 146.251.194.58: :This is a contested technical request (permalink). Anthony Appleyard (talk) 23:14, 30 June 2021 (UTC)
- Is the rest of it really a subtitle? A quick search for this book suggests that sources always give the title in full. Lennart97 (talk) 22:49, 29 June 2021 (UTC)
- The Arabic spelling is شقائق الأترنج في رقائق الغنج . What does it mean? Google Translate says "Citron chips in coquette chips", which does not make sense to me. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 23:19, 30 June 2021 (UTC)
- It makes sense to me as a euphemism for something inside something else... I think you can guess what things in particular. Andrewa (talk) 03:57, 7 July 2021 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.