![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Untitled
editI moved this article from Cossack sabre to Shashka. Please don't use cut-'n'-paste page moves, because that loses the edit history, which is important for satisfying Wikipedia's GFDL licensing of contributions. —Michael Z. 2005-09-2 18:26 Z
- And, unlike me, don't move an article to a misspelled name. Thanks for fixing that, Mikkalai. —Michael Z. 2005-09-2 19:34 Z
The introductory article first says it is a guardless (without hilt) sword, then says the hilt was often decorated. The first sentence also says it is single-edged, then later in the same paragraph says it was double edged. Can't be both. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.127.191.14 (talk) 07:51, 14 March 2008 (UTC)
- The guard is a part of the hilt. Ergo, a sword can be guardless and still have a hilt. The way it is written now does not lead to that conclusion IMO. Observer31 (talk) 21:49, 20 April 2008 (UTC)
Shashka or Sashka is originaly an Adyghe word, "Sashkoa" means long knife, "Sa" means knife "Shkoa" means big, long, great. Andynapso (talk) 10:00, 14 March 2008 (UTC)
Kind of saber? Shashka users always insist that shashka is not a saber but a sword. They usually point out that the techniques for using a shashka are quite different from those with sabers. Shashka is more straightforward, shashka fencing is more like iai-do: it is about quickly drawing the weapon and delivering a blow. 213.87.134.254 (talk) 19:30, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
File:Circassiansaber.jpg Nominated for Deletion
editAn image used in this article, File:Circassiansaber.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests March 2012
Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.
To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:Circassiansaber.jpg)
|
Oddly Formatted
editI'm not sure if it's against etiquette but the picture on the top left seems very oddly placed. This article could probably use some love. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.46.244.133 (talk) 00:10, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
Other spelling
editShasqua --Юе Артеміс (talk) 11:25, 4 August 2018 (UTC)
Revised article
editI have revised the article, removing a lot of non-encyclopaedic - frankly, 'fan-boy' - content and introduced a good deal of directly cited, more impartial and technical content. I have left some material in place which I could not verify, but which seems useful. Urselius (talk) 14:45, 11 March 2020 (UTC)