Talk:Shaw Air Force Base
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Base Realignment and Closure, 2005
editIn order for this template to be displayed on this page we need to have some information pertaining to BRAC and this facility. Because their is no information on the page, I am moving the templete here until the information can be uploaded. For more information, click here. TomStar81 03:49, 28 August 2005 (UTC)
Information added - bwmoll3 12/10/06
I was assigned here
editI was assigned to the 363d TRW between 1980 and 1981. Also to Ninth Air Force/Centaf between 1985 and 1989 - bwmoll3 12/10/06
Wrong Coordinates from Seymour-Johnson AFB
editThe given coordinates link to the Seymour-Johnson AFB in the south of Goldsboro, North Carolina. Could someone please fix it?
Thanks, Paule, 2007-01-20, 22.47 —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 130.83.200.101 (talk) 21:48, 20 January 2007 (UTC).
Immediate correction requested: Shaw is not a joint service base
editGood morning, Shaw Air Force Base is not categorized as a joint base. Third Army/ARCENT is simply a tenant unit on the base. Can you please remove all references to "Joint Base Shaw, JB Shaw" and replace them with "Shaw Air Force Base, Shaw AFB"? Thanks! 20th Fighter Wing Public Affairs 166.137.12.134 (talk) 11:33, 14 June 2011 (UTC)
- Not a problem Bwmoll3 (talk) 12:35, 14 June 2011 (UTC)
References and accuracy
editThe section on the 4411th CCTG cites Ravenstein. He does not mention the group. Moreover, the group was not inactivated in 1963, it continued at Shaw until 1969 (see Mueller, p. 532). In addition the resources of the 837th Air Division (also mentioned in this section) did not transfer to the 363d Wing, but were used primarily to form the USAF Tactical Air Reconnaissance Center, which activated the same day the 837th inactivated. (again, see Mueller, p. 533).
References to Manning, Martin, Mueller, Ravenstein, Rogers, Shaw lack page numbers.
Reference to Baugher is to a dead link. This also appears to be referenced more than one way. (see comment on Shaw AFB site below. Cannot verify because of dead link).
References are in a peculiar format. There appears to be an attempt to link some, but the links are not correct. Use of the cite book and cite web templates could help in this area.
The FAA master record is not current
"Shaw Air Force Base official web site"; "Shaw AFB website"; and "Shaw AFB, public website" all link to the same page, and none of the links contains full information on the site. --Lineagegeek (talk) 20:57, 5 September 2015 (UTC)
All edits from 209.22.107.138 are NOT to be trusted, vadilism, saying the base has an UNDERGROUND railway, that is hunted. But to be honest i'm to lazy to fix all of it. Please review his edits, feel free to remove this entry if you do so. Alex at kms (talk) 23:47, 21 January 2016 (UTC)
External links modified (January 2018)
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Shaw Air Force Base. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060925110244/http://www.csd.uwo.ca/~pettypi/elevon/baugher_us/ to http://www.csd.uwo.ca/~pettypi/elevon/baugher_us/
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060206142720/http://www.centaf.af.mil/ to http://www.centaf.af.mil/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:27, 23 January 2018 (UTC)