Sheep Track Member has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: May 15, 2024. (Reviewed version). |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
GA Review
editGA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Sheep Track Member/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Nominator: Volcanoguy (talk · contribs)
Reviewer: Jaguar (talk · contribs) 13:25, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
Comments to follow soon. ♦ JAGUAR 13:25, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
- "The Sheep Track Member was originally defined as the Sheep Track Formation in 1984 " - consider condensing this to It to avoid repetition
- " its recognition as a geological formation has since been abandoned" - do we know why? Perhaps due to its size?
- I haven't been able to find information on why its rank was changed from formation to member. I'm guessing it's small size and similar age to the Big Raven Formation is why it was reassigned as a member of that formation. Volcanoguy 15:54, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
- "that were deposited about one million and 0.3 million years ago, respectively." - 300,000?
My apologies for the long delay. Given the article's size there is not much to point out, but rather its number of good quality references and well-written prose assures me of it meeting the GA criteria as it is. Well done. ♦ JAGUAR 16:20, 15 May 2024 (UTC)