Talk:Sheep dip

Well I'll be sheep-dipped

I always thought this was a food!!

how is toxicity dealt with?

If some commonly used sheep dips are highly toxic to humans, who can be contaminated by skin contact with it, then why don't the sheep suffer similar ill effects? The sheep are fully immersed in the sheep dip, so their area of external skin contact would be around 100 per cent, and that contact would presumably remain high for some time thereafter so that the dip will perform its function. If the toxic chemicals can pass through human skin, then it seems probably that it would also pass through sheep skin. Further, are the sheep prevented from ingesting the toxic dip during their immersion in it?

Is it safe to consume the meat or dairy products of sheep that have been dipped in toxic dip? Are those sheep products tested for presence of the specific toxic chemicals? How is the dipped sheep's wool cleansed of the toxic sheep dip before being made into clothing intended to cover the skin of humans?

216.66.97.2 16:58, 18 May 2007 (UTC)

That's an interesting point actually. I'm not totally sure of the answers, but what I do know is that yes the dip can get sequestered into the fat in the wool of the animals, as farmers are advised to wash carefully after handling newly-dipped sheep for a few days afterwards. However, after a few days that risk is known to be diminished so presumably it moves back out of the wool and is washed away by rain, general rough and tumble.

Another thing is that the type of thing organophosphates give rise to in humans are neurological... fatigue, dizziness... possibly it does have some effects on the sheep, but it would be difficult to tell.

The sheep aren't prevented from ingesting it, but the design of sheep dipping baths is such that there isn't a great opportunity for ingesting the dip. They are only totally immersed for about 2 seconds. There's a bar below head level that they need to duck under to move on and out of the bath.

All products granted a Veterinary Product Authorisation (that's what they're called in Ireland, there are similar in other countries), and intended for use in food animals, , have a specific withdrawal period worked out for them, which makes up part of the regulatory submission during the drug's development, and is printed on the container. There is one for milk and one for meat products. This takes the form of a statement "For the duration of treatment and X days afterward, products from this animal must not enter the human food chain" or "This animal must not be slaughtered for human consumption for a minimum of X days after the date of the last treatment".

Angel delicia 11:29, 20 May 2007 (UTC)

Intel practice

wikt:sheep-dip shows there is a homonym (or homophone with respect to the hyphen) with a vastly different meaning. I'm not sure if we can create a disambiguation hatnote to a Wiktionary article. If not, I don't see any way of giving readers a heads-up about this situation as we don't seem to have an article discussing this other phenomenon. Perhaps some mention could be entered into the shill article? __meco (talk) 13:30, 23 January 2011 (UTC)

First picture contradicted by second section?

Why is the main picture what it is when the first paragraph of History then explains that it's not actually sheep-dipping? Make the second picture the main one, or use a picture of modern sheep-dipping. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aldrenean (talk • contribs) 08:15, 21 November 2017 (UTC)