Talk:Shego/GA1

Latest comment: 15 years ago by The Prince of Darkness in topic GA Reassessment

GA Reassessment

edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
I'm listing this article for GA reassessment because I believe it fails the GA criteria. The following needs to be addressed:

  • The lead section is insufficient; it should be at least 2 paragraphs, preferably 3, summarising the entire article.
  • The article's layout is not good. The whole article (except for "Creation and reception" which is very short) consists of plot information and possibly original research. As for "Creation and reception", they should be separate sections as they deal with completely different things.
  • It's not well-written; it's not written from a neutral point of view and the prose is not good. As an example: never begin sentences with "In fact".
  • It doesn't contain reliable sources, only primary sources (the episodes themselves), YouTube (very bad), a website that doesn't support the statement (tv.disney.go.com), and some German article that's impossible for non-German speakers to verify.
  • The article is not broad in its coverage as it's (as I mentioned earlier) consisting of mostly plot info and OR. Creation and reception sections need to be rewritten and expanded, citing reliable sources.
  • It doesn't stay focused on the topic, and goes into unnecessary plot details. The plot needs to be severely trimmed, as per WP:PLOT.
  • The article contains way too many fair use images, and goes against WP:NFCC. Except for the image in the infobox, the rest aren't really necessary, as they don't depict important aspects of the character. Relevant information is covered decently by the text itself.

If these concerns aren't addressed within a week, I will delist the article from its GA status. The Prince (talk) 22:05, 2 December 2008 (UTC)Reply

It's been a week, and since no one has addressed my concerns, I'm delisting the article from its GA status. The Prince (talk) 22:08, 9 December 2008 (UTC)Reply