This level-5 vital article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
draft comments
editHsieh and Tao Jiang identify Shen Buhai with the fa tradition as together with Han Fei in particular, but Creel, Goldin and Hsieh note, xing-ming is regarded as his most important comment, as an extension of his earlier ming-shi. Julia Ching identifies Name as prominent.FourLights (talk) 15:55, 6 December 2023 (UTC)
notes
editCreel 1970 p98. majestic arbiter, quotation, techniques, "team of ministers", leaving duties to ministers
Creel 1970 p99. wuwei, said to have been a daoist, but may not have been in his own time
Untitled
editReviewed:
Law and Morality in Ancient China
Little used
China's Legalists: The Early Totalitarians: The Early Totalitarians
An Introduction to Chinese Philosophy
From Destiny to Dao: A Survey of Pre-Qin Philosophy in China
Unused
Ancient China: A History
Xunzi: Books 7-16
sources to implement
- Julia Ching, R. W. L. Guisso. 1991. p.75,119. Sages and Filial Sons. https://books.google.com/books?id=ynfrlFZcUG8C&pg=PA75
- Goldin, Paul R. (2005), "Insidious Syncretism in the Political Philosophy of Huainanzi", After Confucius, Studies in Early Chinese Philosophy, University of Hawai'i Press, pp. 90–111, ISBN 978-0-8248-2842-4, retrieved 2023-08-23