Talk:Shengli Oil Field
Latest comment: 2 months ago by SL93 in topic Did you know nomination
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Shengli Oil Field article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
 | A fact from Shengli Oil Field appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 12 September 2024 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|  |
Did you know nomination
edit- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by SL93 talk 20:24, 1 September 2024 (UTC)
- ... that the management zoning of the Yellow River Delta National Nature Reserve was partially designed around the needs of the Shengli Oil Field? Source: This condition may reflect the fact that the functional zoning map of the YRDNR represents a trade-off between wetland habitat protection and oil field development
Created by Chipmunkdavis (talk).
Number of QPQs required: 2. Nominator has 40 past nominations.
CMD (talk) 14:43, 1 August 2024 (UTC). Note: Edited into a multi-nom, 2 QPQs included. CMD (talk) 11:23, 6 August 2024 (UTC)
For both articles:
| General: Article is new enough and long enough |
|---|
| Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
|---|
|
Hook eligibility:
- Cited:
- Interesting:
- I'm a little confused about the hook. Do you mean to say that the borders were laid out to minimize overlap between the reserve and the oil field? If so, then yeah, that is interesting.
| QPQ: Done. |
Overall: 
@Chipmunkdavis: Nice work on both articles. I had one question about the hook, though. Epicgenius (talk) 00:40, 27 August 2024 (UTC)
- @Epicgenius:, thanks for the review. You are essentially correct about the hook meaning, although it applies to both the overall border and the "core area" border. See Fig 1 here for the park map, and how if you take crane nests as an environmental proxy, there's a mismatch between park and environment. Oil operations also continued in the park, of the remaining overlap of oil wells, there are 94 in the core area, 35 in the buffer zone and 396 in the experimental zone. Is there a rewording that would help clarify the hook? CMD (talk) 07:32, 28 August 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks for the response. I'd personally suggest something like "the borders of the Yellow River Delta National Nature Reserve were intended to minimize overlap with the Shengli Oil Field". Epicgenius (talk) 12:55, 28 August 2024 (UTC)
- ALT1: ... that the borders of the Yellow River Delta National Nature Reserve were drawn to minimize impact on the Shengli Oil Field?
- Sounds reasonable, borders can be internal. See ALT1. I'm looking for something stronger than "intended", as that may read as the intention not succeeding. CMD (talk) 13:20, 28 August 2024 (UTC)
ALT1 looks good to me. Epicgenius (talk) 14:01, 28 August 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks for the response. I'd personally suggest something like "the borders of the Yellow River Delta National Nature Reserve were intended to minimize overlap with the Shengli Oil Field". Epicgenius (talk) 12:55, 28 August 2024 (UTC)
