This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Journalism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of journalism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JournalismWikipedia:WikiProject JournalismTemplate:WikiProject JournalismJournalism articles
her education/career is an advert as to everywhere shes been done (i now see verbatim out of al jazeera). Which is beyong encycpaedic content.(Lihaas (talk) 06:07, 18 July 2010 (UTC)Reply
An education and career section should absolutely be included in any biography when possible, it is necessary in order to provide comprehensive coverage of the individual. In this case it looks to have been written fairly neutrally, there isn't really much puffery or peacock terms being used. That being said, the entire career and education section has been pulled from the Al Jazeera website, and may be a copyright violation - I have tagged it for review. --Jezebel'sPonyoshhh13:56, 19 July 2010 (UTC)Reply
During the course of the copyright cleanup, I removed the POV tag, which is no longer warranted by the article in its present state (and I'd venture that even the initial addition could probably have been debatable). MLauba(Talk)13:17, 27 July 2010 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
One or more portions of this article duplicated other source(s). The material was copied from: http://english.aljazeera.net/aboutus/2008/09/2008910114254204111.html. Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original orplagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. MLauba(Talk)13:14, 27 July 2010 (UTC)Reply
