Talk:Shin of Hindukush

Latest comment: 9 years ago by Gnostrat in topic Merger Proposal

Untitled section 1

edit

Hi NostinAdrek
Please remove the Tags from this article as I have already provided the citations from secondary sources which are verifiable . The article is notable and concerns a tribe of the Hindu Kush .
Cheers
Intothefire (talk) 18:49, 20 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Hi Intothefire,

I've removed the tags, and I've reworded the material. I've not changed anything - I just rewrote what was there. It needed rewording because the English was difficult to understand. Please check what I wrote to make sure it makes sense to you. NostinAdrek (talk) 23:10, 20 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Hi NostinAdrek

I had recorded the exact quote from the book and which is why there were Inverted commas . Now if those are removed as you have done ...it opens the field for vandals to mess up the quote , and I suspect there is no way for good samiratan vandal patrollers on wikipedia to figure this out . Loads of my cited content is vandalled this and other ways by determined vandals usually annonymous . That being said I leave it to your better judjment . Anyway thanks for contributing to improving Wikipedia .
Cheers
Intothefire (talk) 08:35, 21 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Vandal Edits of referenced content

edit

68.150.62.236 on 2 September 2010 Intothefire (talk) 16:10, 13 October 2010 (UTC)Reply

Merger Proposal

edit

It is proposed that the article Shina people should be merged in to this article. What do you think?. ScitDeitalk 09:40, 7 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

Nope. Live with your shame. -Anonymous — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:5B0:2BFF:3EF0:0:0:0:3A (talk) 03:44, 8 October 2013 (UTC)Reply

They both clearly refer to the same people, more usually called Shina in modern ethnographic literature. A single article per ethnic group is normal practice. Also, 'Shin of Hindukush' is an odd title: standard WP naming convention for articles of this type would suggest that this one be merged into Shina people and not the other way around. Gnostrat (talk) 04:55, 22 May 2015 (UTC)   DoneReply