Full disclosure

edit
  • I note the issues and warning posted on this article. Full disclosure: the Tyler Foundation employ me to do this work. However, they definitely want me to write an article which is fully compliant with Wikipedia's policies. I am new at Wikipedia and have a lot to learn. Please help me improve this article because they are a great charity doing important work to help kids. What can I change to make it fully compliant with Wikipedia's policies? A list of press references can be seen here: http://www.tylershineon.org/about/media/ Thank you! PureEnterprise 05:20, 30 October 2011‎ (UTC)
  • Well, you did two things right: One, you honestly disclosed that had a conflict of interest, and second, the article looks pretty good. It will get refined as time goes on, but what I am seeing today looks overwhelmingly compliant with the goals of Wikipedia. Good job. Dennis Brown (talk) 22:32, 18 November 2011 (UTC)Reply
  • Thank you, Dennis. I have hired a Wikipedia specialist to help clean this article up. He made a big improvement, I think, compared to the earlier versions. If anyone else reading this would like to help this charity, please help by editing this article to make it more compliant. PureEnterprise 01:01, 24 November 2011‎ (UTC)

Find sources

edit
Northamerica1000(talk) 08:27, 14 December 2011 (UTC)Reply
Let's note that we should throw out anything that is even remotely related to the various sockpuppets that have come out, such as Pureenterprise or any of the official Tyler Foundation websites. This barely passed AFD, and I still do not believe the subject is notable for coverage on Wikipedia.—Ryulong (竜龙) 10:37, 14 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

This organization has changed its name to Shine On! Kids

edit

This organization has changed its name to Shine On! Kids, but I'm not sure how to make the appropriate edits. New website here: http://www.sokids.org/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by 210.172.143.2 (talk) 08:16, 27 December 2012 (UTC)Reply

"Shine On! Kids" is certainly a slogan used by the Tyler Foundation in connection with its campaign, but I can find no evidence at all that it has adopted that as the name of the organisation. JamesBWatson (talk) 12:16, 29 December 2012 (UTC)Reply