Talk:Shingeki
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
edit
This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Asbenn. Peer reviewers: Pawilsong, Jring333.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 09:14, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
This is
edita somewhat dubious, completely unreferenced account of shingeki. It needs to be totally reworked.--Michitaro (talk) 13:14, 12 February 2010 (UTC)
Hello
editso I'm currently working on this article. So far, I added information I collected about the history of shingeki and got rid of the old history section, which seemed dubious as said above. I'm far from finished. I wish to add a section on the Red Purge and how that affected Shingeki. As well as find more information about it wile WWII was going on, and maybe a section on post-shingeki, or at least how we got to post-shingeki Asbenn (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 17:48, 23 October 2018 (UTC)
Peer Review
editThe article is clear and seems be comprehensive. The content of the article is relevant and does not represent a biased perspective. From what has been published, I see no viewpoint as under or overrepresented. There is credible sourcing linked to the article and it looks to be properly sourced at each claim. If anything, the author should add more information about Shingeki. The article is crafted in a way that would spark your interest and provide cross reference to multiple articles which increases the credibility of the article. This is strong foundation to build off of. The history section provides great context and the section on war gives us a sense of the inherent influence of the art form. Pawilsong (talk) 16:30, 12 November 2018 (UTC)